The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In vivo characterization of diatom multipartite plastid targeting signals
Abstract
Plastids of diatoms and related algae are delineated by four membranes: the outermost membrane (CER) is continuous with the endoplasmic reticulum while the inner two membranes are homologous to plastid envelope membranes of vascular plants and green algae. Proteins are transported into these plastids by pre-sequences that have two recognizable domains. To characterize targeting of polypeptides within diatom cells, we generated constructs encoding green fluorecent protein (GFP) fused to leader sequences. A fusion of GFP to the pre-sequence of BiP [an endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized chaperone]resulted in accumulation of GFP within the ER; a construct encoding the pre-sequence of a plastid protein fused to GFP was directed into the plastids. Additional constructs demonstrated that the N-terminal region of the bipartite plastid targeting pre-sequence was necessary for transport of polypeptides to the lumen of the ER, while the C-terminal region was shown to enable the proteins to traverse the plastid double envelope membrane. Our data strongly support the hypothesis of a multi-step plastid targeting process in chromophytic algae and raises questions about the continuity of the ER and CER and the function of the latter in polypeptide trafficking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene transfer to the nucleus and the evolution of chloroplasts
Martin, W., Stoebe, B., Goremykin, V., Hansmann, S., Hasegawa, M., & Kowallik, K. V. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30234 · Cited by 772 · cited 2×
“The ancestral chromophytic plastid is thought to be related to red algae (Martin et al., 1998), which themselves arose by primary endocytobiosis.”
BackgroundTracing the Thread of Plastid Diversity through the Tapestry of Life
Delwiche, C. F. (1999) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/303291 · Cited by 429
THE PROTOPLASMIC ULTRASTRUCTURE OF THE VEGETATIVE CELL OF MELOSIRA VARIANS C. A. AGARDH1
Crawford, R. M. (1973) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-3646.1973.00050.x · Cited by 57
Cited by
Genetic Engineering of Algae for Enhanced Biofuel Production
Radakovits, R., Jinkerson, R. E., Darzins, A., & Posewitz, M. C. (2010) · Eukaryotic Cell · doi:10.1128/ec.00364-09 · Cited by 1,142
The Number, Speed, and Impact of Plastid Endosymbioses in Eukaryotic Evolution
Keeling, P. J. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120144 · Cited by 493
Diatoms, Biomineralization Processes, and Genomics
Hildebrand, M. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr078253z · Cited by 400
Current trends to comprehend lipid metabolism in diatoms
Zulu, N. N., Zienkiewicz, K., Vollheyde, K., & Feussner, I. (2018) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2018.03.001 · Cited by 226
Genomic Insights into Marine Microalgae
Parker, M. S., Mock, T., & Armbrust, E. V. (2008) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091417 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Apt, K. E., Zaslavkaia, L., Lippmeier, J. C., Lang, M., Kilian, O., Wetherbee, R., Grossman, A. R., & Kroth, P. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 4061-4069
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2138902845
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo characterization of diatom multipartite plastid targeting signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.00092
- The paper
- Apt, K. E., Zaslavkaia, L., Lippmeier, J. C., Lang, M., Kilian, O., Wetherbee, R., Grossman, A. R., & Kroth, P. G. (2002). In vivo characterization of diatom multipartite plastid targeting signals. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.