The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease
Abstract
Endogenous direct-current electric fields (dcEFs) occur in vivo in the form of epithelial transcellular potentials or neuronal field potentials, and a variety of cells respond to dcEFs in vitro by directional movement. This is termed galvanotaxis. The passive influx of Ca2+ on the anodal side should increase the local intracellular Ca2+ concentration, whereas passive efflux and/or intracellular redistribution decrease the local intracellular Ca2+ concentration on the cathodal side. These changes could give rise to `push-pull' effects, causing net movement of cells towards the cathode. However, such effects would be complicated in cells that possess voltage-gated Ca2+ channels and/or intracellular Ca2+ stores. Moreover, voltage-gated Na+ channels, protein kinases, growth factors, surface charge and electrophoresis of proteins have been found to be involved in galvanotaxis. Galvanotactic mechanisms might operate in both the short term (seconds to minutes) and the long term (minutes to hours), and recent work has shown that they might be involved in metastatic disease. The galvanotactic responses of strongly metastatic prostate and breast cancer cells are much more prominent, and the cells move in the opposite direction compared with corresponding weakly metastatic cells. This could have important implications for the metastatic process and has clinical implications. Galvanotaxis could thus play a significant role in both cellular physiology and pathophysiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling
Berridge, M. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361315a0 · Cited by 6,545
Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms
Friedl, P., & Wolf, K. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1075 · Cited by 3,222
Sodium/Calcium Exchange: Its Physiological Implications
Blaustein, M. P., & Lederer, W. J. (1999) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1999.79.3.763 · Cited by 1,736
Somlyo, A. P., & Somlyo, A. V. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-2-00177.x · Cited by 1,207
Mechanisms of normal and tumor-derived angiogenesis
Papetti, M., & Herman, I. M. (2002) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00389.2001 · Cited by 809 · cited 1×
“An intriguing question is whether endothelial galvanotaxis is involved in angiogenesis, a process of fundamental physiological and pathophysiological importance (Papetti and Herman, 2002).”
BackgroundImpulse activity and the patterning of connections during cns development
Shatz, C. J. (1990) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(90)90333-b · Cited by 766
General mechanisms of metastasis
Woodhouse, E. C., Chuaqui, R. F., & Liotta, L. A. (1997) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971015)80:8+<1529::aid-cncr2>3.3.co;2-# · Cited by 609
General mechanisms of metastasis
Woodhouse, E. C., Chuaqui, R. F., & Liotta, L. A. (1997) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971015)80:8+<1529::aid-cncr2>3.0.co;2-f · Cited by 581
The surface properties of cancer cells: a review.
Abercrombie, M., & AMBROSE, E. J. (1962) · PubMed · Cited by 572
Calcium signalling—an overview
Bootman, M. D., Collins, T. J., Peppiatt, C. M., Prothero, L. S., MacKenzie, L., De Smet, P., Travers, M., Tovey, S. C., Seo, J. T., Berridge, M. J., et al. (2001) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1006/scdb.2000.0211 · Cited by 531
Cited by
Role of membrane potential in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation
Sundelacruz, S., Levin, M., & Kaplan, D. L. (2009) · Stem Cell Reviews and Reports · doi:10.1007/s12015-009-9080-2 · Cited by 489
Liu, Z., Wan, X., Wang, Z. L., & Li, L. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202007429 · Cited by 478
Electromagnetic effects—From cell biology to medicine
Funk, R. H. W., Monsees, T., & Özkucur, N. (2009) · Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.proghi.2008.07.001 · Cited by 423
The Microbiologist’s Guide to Membrane Potential Dynamics
Benarroch, J. M., & Asally, M. (2020) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2019.12.008 · Cited by 333
Pires, F., Ferreira, Q., Rodrigues, C. A. V., Morgado, J., & Ferreira, F. C. (2015) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.01.020 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- Mycielska, M. E., & Djamgoz, M. B. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1631-1639
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2100384057
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.01125
- The paper
- Mycielska, M. E., & Djamgoz, M. B. A. (2004). Cellular mechanisms of direct-current electric field effects: galvanotaxis and metastatic disease. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.