The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface
Open accessAbstract
The kinetochore is a control module that both powers and regulates chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis. The kinetochore-microtubule interface is remarkably fluid, with the microtubules growing and shrinking at their point of attachment to the kinetochore. Furthermore, the kinetochore itself is highly dynamic, its makeup changing as cells enter mitosis and as it encounters microtubules. Active kinetochores have yet to be isolated or reconstituted, and so the structure remains enigmatic. Nonetheless, recent advances in genetic, bioinformatic and imaging technology mean we are now beginning to understand how kinetochores assemble, bind to microtubules and release them when the connections made are inappropriate, and also how they influence microtubule behaviour. Recent work has begun to elucidate a pathway of kinetochore assembly in animal cells; the work has revealed that many kinetochore components are highly dynamic and that some cycle between kinetochores and spindle poles along microtubules. Further studies of the kinetochore-microtubule interface are illuminating: (1) the role of the Ndc80 complex and components of the Ran-GTPase system in microtubule attachment, force generation and microtubule-dependent inactivation of kinetochore spindle checkpoint activity; (2) the role of chromosomal passenger proteins in the correction of kinetochore attachment errors; and (3) the function of microtubule plus-end tracking proteins, motor depolymerases and other proteins in kinetochore movement on microtubules and movement coupled to microtubule poleward flux.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic instability of microtubule growth
Mitchison, T., & Kirschner, M. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/312237a0 · Cited by 3,337
Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes
Desai, A., Verma, S., Mitchison, T. J., & Walczak, C. E. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80960-5 · Cited by 708
The Microtubule-destabilizing Kinesin XKCM1 Regulates Microtubule Dynamic Instability in Cells
Kline-Smith, S. L., & Walczak, C. E. (2002) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e01-12-0143 · Cited by 163
Maiato, H., Sampaio, P., Lemos, C. L., Findlay, J., Carmena, M., Earnshaw, W. C., & Sunkel, C. E. (2002) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200201101 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Cited by
The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time
Musacchio, A., & Salmon, E. D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2163 · Cited by 2,227
Self-citationTracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips
Akhmanova, A., & Steinmetz, M. O. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2369 · Cited by 1,047
Molecular architecture of the kinetochore–microtubule interface
Cheeseman, I. M., & Desai, A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2310 · Cited by 915
A Molecular View of Kinetochore Assembly and Function
Musacchio, A., & Desai, A. (2017) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology6010005 · Cited by 544
The Aurora kinase family in cell division and cancer
Vader, G., & Lens, S. M. A. (2008) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2008.07.003 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Maiato, H., DeLuca, J., Salmon, E. D., & Earnshaw, W. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 5461-5477
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2094533427
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.01536
- The paper
- Maiato, H., DeLuca, J., Salmon, E. D., & Earnshaw, W. C. (2004). The dynamic kinetochore-microtubule interface. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.