The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Keratocyte networks visualised in the living cornea using vital dyes
Abstract
Fluorescent viability probes have been used to visualise and investigate the viability, morphology and organisation of the keratocyte within the stroma of the intact living cornea. The live cell probe, calcien-AM, in combination with a dead cell probe, ethidium homodimer (Live/Dead Assay, Molecular Probes, U.S.A.) proved superior to earlier generation vital dyes such as fluorescein diacetate or 5,6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate, initially used in combination with ethidium bromide. The ubiquitous distribution of esterase enzymes that cleave calcien-AM within the keratocyte cytoplasm produced a high concentration of fluorescently active calcein throughout the cell, including fine cell processes. Epi-illuminated fluorescence microscopy on transparent corneal dissections subsequently revealed details of keratocyte microanatomy and three-dimensional network organisation in situ. Three morphologically discrete subpopulations of keratocytes were identified: two formed relatively small bands of cells, immediately subjacent to either Bowman’s or Descemet’s membranes, the third subpopulation constituting the majority of keratocytes typically located within the corneal stroma. The results indicate that calcein-AM is able to penetrate intact living cornea revealing cell viability, and it also has the capacity to ‘trace’ cellular elements and reveal fine structure within a dense connective tissue matrix.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collagen fibrillogenesis in vitro: interaction of types I and V collagen regulates fibril diameter
Birk, D. E., Fitch, J. M., Babiarz, J. P., Doane, K. J., & Linsenmayer, T. F. (1990) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.95.4.649 · Cited by 596
Cited by
Concise Review: Evidence for CD34 as a Common Marker for Diverse Progenitors
Sidney, L. E., Branch, M. J., Dunphy, S. E., Dua, H. S., & Hopkinson, A. (2014) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1661 · Cited by 872
The molecular basis of corneal transparency
Hassell, J. R., & Birk, D. E. (2010) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2010.06.021 · Cited by 557
A global view of protein expression in human cells, tissues, and organs
Pontén, F., Gry, M., Fagerberg, L., Lundberg, E., Asplund, A., Berglund, L., Oksvold, P., Björling, E., Hober, S., Kampf, C., et al. (2009) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2009.93 · Cited by 222
Keeping an Eye on Decellularized Corneas: A Review of Methods, Characterization and Applications
Wilson, S., Sidney, L., Dunphy, S., Rose, J., & Hopkinson, A. (2013) · Journal of Functional Biomaterials · doi:10.3390/jfb4030114 · Cited by 100
Kawakita, T., Espana, E. M., He, H., Hornia, A., Yeh, L.-K., Ouyang, J., Liu, C.-Y., & Tseng, S. C. G. (2005) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m409567200 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Poole, C. A., Brookes, N. H., & Clover, G. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1993-10-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 685-691
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2113968341
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Keratocyte networks visualised in the living cornea using vital dyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.106.2.685
- The paper
- Poole, C. A., Brookes, N. H., & Clover, G. M. (1993). Keratocyte networks visualised in the living cornea using vital dyes. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.106.2.685
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.