The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms
Abstract
A model is proposed for an amplification step in chemotactically sensitive cells or growth cones that accounts for their extraordinary directional sensitivity. It is assumed that cells have an intrinsic pattern forming system that generates the signals for extension of filopods and lamellipods. An external signal such as a graded cue is assumed to impose some directional preference onto the pattern formed. According to the model, a saturating, self-enhancing reaction is coupled with two antagonistic reactions. One antagonist equilibrates rapidly over the whole cell, causing competition between different surface elements of the cell cortex for activation. It will be won by those cortical regions of the cell that are exposed to the highest concentrations of the external graded cues. The second antagonistic reaction is assumed to act more locally and has a longer time constant. It causes a destabilization of peaks after they have formed. While the total activated area on the cell surface is maintained, the disappearance of some hot spots allows the formation of new ones, preferentially at positions specified by the actual external guiding signal. Computer simulations show that the model accounts for the highly dynamic behaviour of chemotactic cells and growth cones. In the absence of external signals, maxima of the internal signals emerge at random positions and disappear after some time. Travelling waves or oscillations in counter phase can emerge on the cell cortex, in agreement with observations reported in the literature. In other ranges of parameters, the model accounts for the generation of a stable cell polarity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The chemical basis of morphogenesis
Turing, A. M. (1952) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1952.0012 · Cited by 11,733
Inositol trisphosphate and calcium signalling
Berridge, M. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361315a0 · Cited by 6,545
Cited by
Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition
Meinhardt, H., & Gierer, A. (2000) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/1521-1878(200008)22:8<753::aid-bies9>3.0.co;2-z · Cited by 615
Self-citationMechanical Feedback through E-Cadherin Promotes Direction Sensing during Collective Cell Migration
Cai, D., Chen, S.-C., Prasad, M., He, L., Wang, X., Choesmel-Cadamuro, V., Sawyer, J. K., Danuser, G., & Montell, D. J. (2014) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.045 · Cited by 512
Swaney, K. F., Huang, C.-H., & Devreotes, P. N. (2010) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.093008.131228 · Cited by 494
Eukaryotic Chemotaxis: Distinctions between Directional Sensing and Polarization
Devreotes, P., & Janetopoulos, C. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.r300010200 · Cited by 447
Models of Eukaryotic Gradient Sensing: Application to Chemotaxis of Amoebae and Neutrophils
Levchenko, A., & Iglesias, P. A. (2002) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75373-3 · Cited by 422
Metadata
- Authors
- Meinhardt, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2867-2874
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2188659719
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.112.17.2867
- The paper
- Meinhardt, H. (1999). Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.112.17.2867
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.