The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microtubule minus-end anchorage at centrosomal and non-centrosomal sites: the role of ninein
Abstract
The novel concept of a centrosomal anchoring complex, which is distinct from the γ-tubulin nucleating complex, has previously been proposed following studies on cochlear epithelial cells. In this investigation we present evidence from two different cell systems which suggests that the centrosomal protein ninein is a strong candidate for the proposed anchoring complex. Ninein has recently been observed in cultured fibroblast cells to localise primarily to the post-mitotic mother centriole, which is the focus for a classic radial microtubule array. We show here by immunoelectron microscopical analyses of centrosomes from mouse L929 cells that ninein concentrates at the appendages surrounding the mother centriole and at the microtubule minus-ends. We further show that localisation of ninein in the cochlear supporting epithelial cells, where the vast majority of the microtubule minus-ends are associated with apical non-centrosomal sites, suggests that it is not directly involved in microtubule nucleation. Ninein seems to play an important role in the positioning and anchorage of the microtubule minus-ends in these epithelial cells. Evidence is presented which suggests that ninein is released from the centrosome, translocated with the microtubules, and is responsible for the anchorage of microtubule minus-ends to the apical sites. We propose that ninein is a non-nucleating microtubule minus-end associated protein which may have a dual role as a minus-end capping and anchoring protein.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gilbert, T., Le Bivic, A., Quaroni, A., & Rodriguez-Boulan, E. (1991) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.113.2.275 · Cited by 234
Cited by
Control of microtubule organization and dynamics: Two ends in the limelight
Akhmanova, A., & Steinmetz, M. O. (2015) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm4084 · Cited by 895
The cytoplasmic dynein transport machinery and its many cargoes
Reck-Peterson, S. L., Redwine, W. B., Vale, R. D., & Carter, A. P. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0004-3 · Cited by 659
Arts, H. H., Doherty, D., van Beersum, S. E. C., Parisi, M. A., Letteboer, S. J. F., Gorden, N. T., Peters, T. A., Märker, T., Voesenek, K., Kartono, A., et al. (2007) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng2069 · Cited by 317
BBSome trains remove activated GPCRs from cilia by enabling passage through the transition zone
Ye, F., Nager, A. R., & Nachury, M. V. (2018) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201709041 · Cited by 256
Tillery, M. M. L., Zheng, C., Zheng, Y., & Megraw, T. L. (2024) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e23-06-0245 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Mogensen, M. M., Malik, A., Piel, M., Bouckson-Castaing, V., & Bornens, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3013-3023
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W1935003487
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microtubule minus-end anchorage at centrosomal and non-centrosomal sites: the role of ninein. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.113.17.3013
- The paper
- Mogensen, M. M., Malik, A., Piel, M., Bouckson-Castaing, V., & Bornens, M. (2000). Microtubule minus-end anchorage at centrosomal and non-centrosomal sites: the role of ninein. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.113.17.3013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.