The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The molecular basis and specificity of integrin-ligand interactions
Abstract
Most eukaryotic cells have the ability to recognise and react functionally to adhesive extracellular matrices. This is true not only for actively migrating cells that use adhesive contact for traction and guidance, but also for stationary cells that require a platform for support and orientation. Cell-extracellular matrix adhesion has a homeostatic function in promoting tissue regeneration during wound healing, while aberrant adhesion contributes to the aetiology and pathogenesis of a number of major human diseases including arthritis, cardiovascular disease and cancer. Consistent with this multiplicity of function, extracellular matrices exhibit diversity in both composition and three-dimensional structure. The overall phenotypic effects induced by an extracellular matrix are the sum of multiple, specific ligand-receptor recognition events and therefore the relative distribution of receptors and ligands, in terms of both quantity and spatial presentation, needs to be considered. This structural complexity has however hampered progress towards an understanding of adhesive recognition events at the cellular level and, instead, a great deal of research effort has been concentrated on elucidating the mechanisms of adhesion at the molecular level. This has involved identifying both adhesion factors in extracellular matrices and the cell surface receptors recognising them, pinpointing the active sites in both sets of molecules that mediate ligand-receptor binding, and providing a three-dimensional description of the interactions. This commentary reviews the current state of this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adhesion receptors of the immune system
Springer, T. A. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/346425a0 · Cited by 6,477
Humphries, M. J., Akiyama, S. K., Komoriya, A., Olden, K., & Yamada, K. M. (1986) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.103.6.2637 · Cited by 438
Self-citationTwo contrary functions of tenascin: Dissection of the active sites by recombinant tenascin fragments
Spring, J., Beck, K., & Chiquet-Ehrismann, R. (1989) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(89)90294-8 · Cited by 413
Cited by
Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix
Adams, J. C., & Watt, F. M. (1993) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.117.4.1183 · Cited by 1,208
Biomaterials in Tissue Engineering
Hubbell, J. A. (1995) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt0695-565 · Cited by 1,060
Conformation/activity studies of rationally designed potent anti‐adhesive RGD peptides
GURRATH, M., MÜLLER, G., KESSLER, H., AUMAILLEY, M., & TIMPL, R. (1992) · European Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb17495.x · Cited by 317
Massia, S. P., & Hubbell, J. A. (1992) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)49672-5 · Cited by 287
Integrin signalling in neutrophils and macrophages
Berton, G., & Lowell, C. A. (1999) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/s0898-6568(99)00003-0 · Cited by 224
Metadata
- Authors
- Humphries, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1990-12-01
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 585-592
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W35496378
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The molecular basis and specificity of integrin-ligand interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.97.4.585
- The paper
- Humphries, M. J. (1990). The molecular basis and specificity of integrin-ligand interactions. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.97.4.585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.