The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid epithelialisation of fetal wounds is associated with the early deposition of tenascin
Abstract
Wound healing is a complex process involving the interaction of many cell types with the extracellular matrix (ECM). Fetal skin wound healing differs from that in the adult in that it occurs rapidly and without scar formation. The mechanisms underlying these differing processes may be related to the fetal environment, the stage of differentiation of the fetal cells or the ECM deposited in the wound. The spatial and temporal distribution of two components of the ECM, fibronectin and tenascin, were studied by immunostaining of cryosections from trunk wounds of fetal and adult sheep. Epithelialisation was complete earlier in the fetal wound than in the adult. The distribution of fibronectin was similar in fetal and adult wounds but tenascin was present earlier in the fetal wound. Fibronectin has several roles in wound healing including acting as a substratum for cell migration and as a mediator of cell adhesion through cell surface integrins. The attachment of fibroblasts to fibronectin is inhibited by tenascin and during development the appearance of tenascin in the ECM of migratory pathways correlates with the initiation of cell migration. Similarly, the appearance of tenascin in healing wounds may initiate cell migration. Tenascin was present in these wounds prior to cell migration and the rapid epithelialisation of fetal wounds may be due to the early appearance of tenascin in the wound.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Induction of tenascin in healing wounds
Mackie, E. J., Halfter, W., & Liverani, D. (1988) · The Journal of cell biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.107.6.2757 · Cited by 555
Cited by
Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective
Rodrigues, M., Kosaric, N., Bonham, C. A., & Gurtner, G. C. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00067.2017 · Cited by 3,013
Broughton, G., Janis, J. E., & Attinger, C. E. (2006) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000222562.60260.f9 · Cited by 917
Scar–free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention
Ferguson, M. W. J., & O'Kane, S. (2004) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1475 · Cited by 812
Self-citationScarless Fetal Wound Healing: A Basic Science Review
Larson, B. J., Longaker, M. T., & Lorenz, H. P. (2010) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181eae781 · Cited by 454
Self-citationThe role of tenascin-C in tissue injury and tumorigenesis
Midwood, K. S., & Orend, G. (2009) · Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling · doi:10.1007/s12079-009-0075-1 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitby, D. J., Longaker, M. T., Harrison, M. R., Adzick, N. S., & Ferguson, M. W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cell Science
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1991-07-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 583-586
- ISSN
- 0021-9533 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9137
- OpenAlex
- W2284449925
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid epithelialisation of fetal wounds is associated with the early deposition of tenascin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jcs.99.3.583
- The paper
- Whitby, D. J., Longaker, M. T., Harrison, M. R., Adzick, N. S., & Ferguson, M. W. J. (1991). Rapid epithelialisation of fetal wounds is associated with the early deposition of tenascin. Journal of Cell Science. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.99.3.583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.