The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Wound healing is one of the most complex processes in the human body. It involves the spatial and temporal synchronization of a variety of cell types with distinct roles in the phases of hemostasis, inflammation, growth, re-epithelialization, and remodeling. With the evolution of single cell technologies, it has been possible to uncover phenotypic and functional heterogeneity within several of these cell types. There have also been discoveries of rare, stem cell subsets within the skin, which are unipotent in the uninjured state, but become multipotent following skin injury. Unraveling the roles of each of these cell types and their interactions with each other is important in understanding the mechanisms of normal wound closure. Changes in the microenvironment including alterations in mechanical forces, oxygen levels, chemokines, extracellular matrix and growth factor synthesis directly impact cellular recruitment and activation, leading to impaired states of wound healing. Single cell technologies can be used to decipher these cellular alterations in diseased states such as in chronic wounds and hypertrophic scarring so that effective therapeutic solutions for healing wounds can be developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Biofilms: A Common Cause of Persistent Infections
Costerton, J. W., Stewart, P. S., & Greenberg, E. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 · Cited by 12,167
Isolation of Putative Progenitor Endothelial Cells for Angiogenesis
Asahara, T., Murohara, T., Sullivan, A., Silver, M., van der Zee, R., Li, T., Witzenbichler, B., Schatteman, G., & Isner, J. M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5302.964 · Cited by 8,725
Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., & Longaker, M. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07039 · Cited by 6,542
Self-citationMyofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling
Tomasek, J. J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C., & Brown, R. A. (2002) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm809 · Cited by 4,290
Tumor-Associated Macrophages: From Mechanisms to Therapy
Noy, R., & Pollard, J. W. (2014) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010 · Cited by 4,089
A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs
Crisan, M., Yap, S., Casteilla, L., Chen, C.-W., Corselli, M., Park, T. S., Andriolo, G., Sun, B., Zheng, B., Zhang, L., et al. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.07.003 · Cited by 3,991 · cited 2×
“Another hypothesis is that pericytes and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) with multipotent regeneration capacity arise from the same pool of cells (73).”
BackgroundOf Mice and Not Men: Differences between Mouse and Human Immunology
Mestas, J., & Hughes, C. C. W. (2004) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2731 · Cited by 3,822
VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia
Gerhardt, H., Golding, M., Fruttiger, M., Ruhrberg, C., Lundkvist, A., Abramsson, A., Jeltsch, M., Mitchell, C., Alitalo, K., Shima, D., et al. (2003) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200302047 · Cited by 2,894
Clonal heterogeneity and tumor evolution: past, present, and the future
McGranahan, N., & Swanton, C. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.018 · Cited by 2,840
Pericytes: Developmental, Physiological, and Pathological Perspectives, Problems, and Promises
Armulik, A., Genové, G., & Betsholtz, C. (2011) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.001 · Cited by 2,653
Cited by
Falanga, V., Isseroff, R. R., Soulika, A. M., Romanelli, M., Margolis, D., Kapp, S., Granick, M., & Harding, K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-022-00377-3 · Cited by 1,020
Clinical applications of stem cell-derived exosomes
Tan, F., Li, X., Wang, Z., Li, J., Shahzad, K., & Zheng, J. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01704-0 · Cited by 708
Peng, W., Li, D., Dai, K., Wang, Y., Song, P., Li, H., Tang, P., Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Zhou, Y., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.002 · Cited by 418
Chronic wounds: Current status, available strategies and emerging therapeutic solutions
Las Heras, K., Igartua, M., Santos-Vizcaino, E., & Hernandez, R. M. (2020) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.039 · Cited by 370
Xiong, Y., Mi, B.-B., Lin, Z., Hu, Y.-Q., Yu, L., Zha, K.-K., Panayi, A. C., Yu, T., Chen, L., Liu, Z.-P., et al. (2022) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1186/s40779-022-00426-8 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodrigues, M., Kosaric, N., Bonham, C. A., & Gurtner, G. C.
- Venue
- Physiological Reviews
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2019-01-01
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 665-706
- ISSN
- 0031-9333 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1210
- OpenAlex
- W2902282736
- Cited by
- 3,013
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 17.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/physrev.00067.2017
- The paper
- Rodrigues, M., Kosaric, N., Bonham, C. A., & Gurtner, G. C. (2019). Wound Healing: A Cellular Perspective. Physiological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00067.2017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
