The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A family of vortex wakes generated by a thrush nightingale in free flight in a wind tunnel over its entire natural range of flight speeds
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: In view of the complexity of the wing-beat kinematics and geometry, an important class of theoretical models for analysis and prediction of bird flight performance entirely, or almost entirely, ignores the action of the wing itself and considers only the resulting motions in the air behind the bird. These motions can also be complicated, but some success has previously been recorded in detecting and measuring relatively simple wake structures that can sometimes account for required quantities used to estimate aerodynamic power consumption. To date, all bird wakes, measured or presumed,seem to fall into one of two classes: the closed-loop, discrete vortex model at low flight speeds, and the constant-circulation, continuous vortex model at moderate to high speeds. Here, novel and accurate quantitative measurements of velocity fields in vertical planes aligned with the freestream are used to investigate the wake structure of a thrush nightingale over its entire range of natural flight speeds. At most flight speeds, the wake cannot be categorised as one of the two standard types, but has an intermediate structure, with approximations to the closed-loop and constant-circulation models at the extremes. A careful accounting for all vortical structures revealed with the high-resolution technique permits resolution of the previously unexplained wake momentum paradox. All the measured wake structures have sufficient momentum to provide weight support over the wingbeat. A simple model is formulated and explained that mimics the correct, measured balance of forces in the downstroke- and upstroke-generated wake over the entire range of flight speeds. Pending further work on different bird species, this might form the basis for a generalisable flight model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pennycuick, C. J. (1975) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249405-5.50009-4 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
WALKING ON WATER: Biolocomotion at the Interface
Bush, J. W. M., & Hu, D. L. (2006) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092157 · Cited by 573
Flight Speeds among Bird Species: Allometric and Phylogenetic Effects
Alerstam, T., Rosén, M., Bäckman, J., Ericson, P. G. P., & Hellgren, O. (2007) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050197 · Cited by 286
The evolutionary continuum of limb function from early theropods to birds
Hutchinson, J. R., & Allen, V. (2009) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/s00114-008-0488-3 · Cited by 163
Aerodynamics of wing-assisted incline running in birds
Tobalske, B. W., & Dial, K. P. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.001701 · Cited by 89
A quantitative comparison of bird and bat wakes
Johansson, L. C., Wolf, M., & Hedenström, A. (2010) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0541 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Spedding, G. R., Rosén, M., & Hedenström, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-07-15
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2313-2344
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2154159138
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A family of vortex wakes generated by a thrush nightingale in free flight in a wind tunnel over its entire natural range of flight speeds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.00423
- The paper
- Spedding, G. R., Rosén, M., & Hedenström, A. (2003). A family of vortex wakes generated by a thrush nightingale in free flight in a wind tunnel over its entire natural range of flight speeds. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.