Cited by 163Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The evolutionary continuum of limb function from early theropods to birds

Open access
Hutchinson, John R., Allen, Vivian·2009·Naturwissenschaften

Abstract

The bipedal stance and gait of theropod dinosaurs evolved gradually along the lineage leading to birds and at some point(s), flight evolved. How and when did these changes occur? We review the evidence from neontology and paleontology, including pectoral and pelvic limb functional morphology, fossil footprints/trackways and biomechanical models and simulations. We emphasise that many false dichotomies or categories have been applied to theropod form and function, and sometimes, these impede research progress. For example, dichotomisation of locomotor function into 'non-avian' and 'avian' modes is only a conceptual crutch; the evidence supports a continuous transition. Simplification of pelvic limb function into cursorial/non-cursorial morphologies or flexed/columnar poses has outlived its utility. For the pectoral limbs, even the classic predatory strike vs. flight wing-stroke distinction and separation of theropods into non-flying and flying--or terrestrial and arboreal--categories may be missing important subtleties. Distinguishing locomotor function between taxa, even with quantitative approaches, will always be fraught with ambiguity, making it difficult to find real differences if that ambiguity is properly acknowledged. There must be an 'interpretive asymptote' for reconstructing dinosaur limb function that available methods and evidence cannot overcome. We may be close to that limit, but how far can it be stretched with improved methods and evidence, if at all? The way forward is a combination of techniques that emphasises integration of neontological and paleontological evidence and quantitative assessment of limb function cautiously applied with validated techniques and sensitivity analysis of unknown variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00114-008-0488-3

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hutchinson, J. R., & Allen, V.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Hutchinson, John R.
Venue
Naturwissenschaften
Published
2008-12-24
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
423-448
ISSN
  • 0028-1042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1904
OpenAlex
W2164139482
Cited by
163
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Die Naturwissenschaften (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
theropod dinosaurs, dinosaur-bird transition, limb function, bipedalism, gait evolution, flight evolution, pelvic limb, cursorial locomotion, biomechanical simulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Birds, Biological Evolution, Extremities, Fossils, Gait, Hindlimb, Locomotion, Models, Biological, Phylogeny, Wings, Animal, Dinosaurs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review