The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta
Open accessAbstract
SUMMARY: During flapping flight, insect wings must withstand not only fluid-dynamic forces, but also inertial-elastic forces generated by the rapid acceleration and deceleration of their own mass. Estimates of overall aerodynamic and inertial forces vary widely, and the relative importance of these forces in determining passive wing deformations remains unknown. If aeroelastic interactions between a wing and the fluid-dynamic forces it generates are minor compared to the effects of wing inertia, models of insect flight that account for passive wing flexibility would be far simpler to develop. We used an experimental approach to examine the contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. We attached fresh Manduca wings to a motor and flapped them at a realistic wing-beat frequency and stroke amplitude. We compared wing bending in normal air versus helium (approx. 15% air density), in which the contribution of fluid-dynamic forces to wing deformations is significantly reduced. This 85% reduction in air density produced only slight changes in the pattern of Manduca wing deformations, suggesting that fluid-dynamic forces have a minimal effect on wing bending. We used a simplified finite element model of a wing to show that the differences observed between wings flapped in air versus helium are most likely due to fluid damping, rather than to aerodynamic forces. This suggests that damped finite element models of insect wings (with no fluid-dynamic forces included) may be able to predict overall patterns of wing deformation prior to calculations of aerodynamic force production, facilitating integrative models of insect flight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics
Batchelor, G. K. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511800955 · Cited by 12,360
Vibration problems in engineering
Timoshenko, S. P. (1928) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 3,449
Wing Rotation and the Aerodynamic Basis of Insect Flight
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O., & Sane, S. P. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5422.1954 · Cited by 2,645
Mechanical Design in Organisms
Wainwright, S. A., Biggs, W. D., Currey, J. D., & Gosline, J. M. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv143mdjg · Cited by 1,263
The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight
Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.8.1087 · Cited by 775
The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution
Dudley, R. (2000) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691186344 · Cited by 756
(2000) · doi:10.1093/aesa/93.5.1195f · Cited by 710
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0050 · Cited by 682
Flexural stiffness in insect wings I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation
Combes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.00523 · Cited by 571
Self-citation
Cited by
Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.-K., Cesnik, C. E. S., & Liu, H. (2010) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.01.001 · Cited by 986
Flexible clap and fling in tiny insect flight
Miller, L. A., & Peskin, C. S. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.028662 · Cited by 179
van Breugel, F., Regan, W., & Lipson, H. (2008) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2008.929923 · Cited by 67
How animals glide: from trajectory to morphology
Socha, J. J., Jafari, F., Munk, Y., & Byrnes, G. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2014-0013 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Combes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 206
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2999-3006
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W1997633150
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.00502
- The paper
- Combes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2003). Into thin air: contributions of aerodynamic and inertial-elastic forces to wing bending in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00502
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.