The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight
Abstract
SUMMARY: We used a dynamically scaled model insect to measure the rotational forces produced by a flapping insect wing. A steadily translating wing was rotated at a range of constant angular velocities, and the resulting aerodynamic forces were measured using a sensor attached to the base of the wing. These instantaneous forces were compared with quasi-steady estimates based on translational force coefficients. Because translational and rotational velocities were constant, the wing inertia was negligible, and any difference between measured forces and estimates based on translational force coefficients could be attributed to the aerodynamic effects of wing rotation. By factoring out the geometry and kinematics of the wings from the rotational forces, we determined rotational force coefficients for a range of angular velocities and different axes of rotation. The measured coefficients were compared with a mathematical model developed for two-dimensional motions in inviscid fluids, which we adapted to the three-dimensional case using blade element theory. As predicted by theory, the rotational coefficient varied linearly with the position of the rotational axis for all angular velocities measured. The coefficient also, however, varied with angular velocity, in contrast to theoretical predictions. Using the measured rotational coefficients, we modified a standard quasi-steady model of insect flight to include rotational forces, translational forces and the added mass inertia. The revised model predicts the time course of force generation for several different patterns of flapping kinematics more accurately than a model based solely on translational force coefficients. By subtracting the improved quasi-steady estimates from the measured forces, we isolated the aerodynamic forces due to wake capture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review of Experimental Work in Biomimetic Foils
Triantafyllou, M. S., Techet, A. H., & Hover, F. S. (2004) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2004.833216 · Cited by 448
Flapping flight for biomimetic robotic insects: part I-system modeling
Deng, X., Schenato, L., Wu, W. C., & Sastry, S. S. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2006.875480 · Cited by 355
When vortices stick: an aerodynamic transition in tiny insect flight
Miller, L. A., & Peskin, C. S. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01138 · Cited by 169
Spikes alone do not behavior make: why neuroscience needs biomechanics
Tytell, E., Holmes, P., & Cohen, A. (2011) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.017 · Cited by 135
The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology
Altshuler, D. L., & Dudley, R. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.16.2325 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2002-04-15
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1087-1096
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2152260006
- Cited by
- 775
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.205.8.1087
- The paper
- Sane, S. P., & Dickinson, M. H. (2002). The aerodynamic effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi-steady model of flapping flight. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.205.8.1087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.