The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment
Abstract
SUMMARY: Directional arrays of branched microscopic setae constitute a dry adhesive on the toes of pad-bearing geckos, nature's supreme climbers. Geckos are easily and rapidly able to detach their toes as they climb. There are two known mechanisms of detachment: (1) on the microscale, the seta detaches when the shaft reaches a critical angle with the substrate, and (2) on the macroscale, geckos hyperextend their toes, apparently peeling like tape. This raises the question of how geckos prevent detachment while inverted on the ceiling, where body weight should cause toes to peel and setal angles to increase. Geckos use opposing feet and toes while inverted, possibly to maintain shear forces that prevent detachment of setae or peeling of toes. If detachment occurs by macroscale peeling of toes, the peel angle should monotonically decrease with applied force. In contrast, if adhesive force is limited by microscale detachment of setae at a critical angle, the toe detachment angle should be independent of applied force. We tested the hypothesis that adhesion is increased by shear force in isolated setal arrays and live gecko toes. We also tested the corollary hypotheses that (1) adhesion in toes and arrays is limited as on the microscale by a critical angle, or (2)on the macroscale by adhesive strength as predicted for adhesive tapes. We found that adhesion depended directly on shear force, and was independent of detachment angle. Therefore we reject the hypothesis that gecko toes peel like tape. The linear relation between adhesion and shear force is consistent with a critical angle of release in live gecko toes and isolated setal arrays, and also with our prior observations of single setae. We introduced a new model,frictional adhesion, for gecko pad attachment and compared it to existing models of adhesive contacts. In an analysis of clinging stability of a gecko on an inclined plane each adhesive model predicted a different force control strategy. The frictional adhesion model provides an explanation for the very low detachment forces observed in climbing geckos that does not depend on toe peeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae
Hansen, W. R., & Autumn, K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408304102 · Cited by 601 · cited 1×
“Tokay gecko (Gekko gecko) setal arrays were peeled from seven live adult animals as described previously (Hansen and Autumn, 2005).”
MethodSelf-citationProperties, Principles, and Parameters of the Gecko Adhesive System
Autumn, K. (2006) · Biological Adhesives · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-31049-5_12 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Cited by
Smooth Vertical Surface Climbing With Directional Adhesion
Kim, S., Spenko, M., Trujillo, S., Heyneman, B., Santos, D., & Cutkosky, M. R. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2007.909786 · Cited by 661
Self-citationParness, A., Soto, D., Esparza, N., Gravish, N., Wilkinson, M., Autumn, K., & Cutkosky, M. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0048 · Cited by 277
Self-citationDirectional adhesion of gecko-inspired angled microfiber arrays
Lee, J., Fearing, R. S., & Komvopoulos, K. (2008) · Applied Physics Letters · doi:10.1063/1.3006334 · Cited by 172
Bullock, J. M. R., Drechsler, P., & Federle, W. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.020941 · Cited by 172
Recent advances in the fabrication and adhesion testing of biomimetic dry adhesives
Sameoto, D., & Menon, C. (2010) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/103001 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Autumn, K., Dittmore, A., Santos, D., Spenko, M., & Cutkosky, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2006-09-15
- Volume
- 209
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 3569-3579
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2163974073
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 52.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.