Cited by 157Adhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsAdvanced Materials and MechanicsSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent advances in the fabrication and adhesion testing of biomimetic dry adhesives

Open access
Sameoto, D, Menon, C·2010·Smart Materials and Structures

Abstract

In the past two years, there have been a large number of publications on the topic of biomimetic dry adhesives from modeling, fabrication and testing perspectives. We review and compare the most recent advances in fabrication and testing of these materials. While there is increased convergence and consensus as to what makes a good dry adhesive, the fabrication of these materials is still challenging, particularly for anisotropic or hierarchal designs. Although qualitative comparisons between different adhesive designs can be made, quantifying the exact performance and rating each design is significantly hampered by the lack of standardized testing methods. Manufacturing dry adhesives, which can reliably adhere to rough surfaces, show directional and self-cleaning behavior and are relatively simple to manufacture, is still very challenging—great strides by multiple research groups have however made these goals appear achievable within the next few years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/103001

Cites

73 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Kim S, 2008, IEEE Nano 2008, 780
  2. Lu G, 2008, Nano, 2, 2342
  3. Li Y, 2009, IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Biomimetics (Guilin Guangxi)
  4. Daltorio K A, 2005, Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on Climbing and Walking Robots and the Support Technologies for Mobile Machines, 131

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sameoto, D., & Menon, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
Smart Materials and Structures
Published
2010-08-06
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
103001
ISSN
  • 0964-1726 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-665X
OpenAlex
W1976427011
Cited by
157
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
FWCI
25.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Smart Materials and Structures (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Space Agency
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Keywords
adhesion testing, hierarchical surface structures, self-cleaning surfaces, rough surface adhesion, directional adhesion, standardized test methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review