Cited by 63Physiological and biochemical adaptationsBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Scaling of mechanical power output during burst escape flight in the Corvidae

Jackson, Brandon E., Dial, Kenneth P.·2011·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Avian locomotor burst performance (e.g. acceleration, maneuverability) decreases with increasing body size and has significant implications for the survivorship, ecology and evolution of birds. However, the underlying mechanism of this scaling relationship has been elusive. The most cited mechanistic hypothesis posits that wingbeat frequency alone limits maximal muscular mass-specific power output. Because wingbeat frequency decreases with body size, it may explain the often-observed negative scaling of flight performance. To test this hypothesis we recorded in vivo muscular mechanical power from work-loop mechanics using surgically implanted sonomicrometry (measuring muscle length change) and strain gauges (measuring muscle force) in four species of Corvidae performing burst take-off and vertical escape flight. The scale relationships derived for the four species suggest that maximum muscle-mass-specific power scales slightly negatively with pectoralis muscle mass (M(-0.18)(m), 95% CI: -0.42 to 0.05), but less than the scaling of wingbeat frequency (M(-0.29)(m), 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.23). Mean muscle stress was independent of muscle mass (M(-0.02)(m), 95% CI: -0.20 to 0.19), but total muscle strain (percent length change) scaled positively (M(0.12)(m), 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.18), which is consistent with previous results from ground birds (Order Galliformes). These empirical results lend minimal support to the power-limiting hypothesis, but also suggest that muscle function changes…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.046789

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The work output from the flight muscles, 66 J/kg, was close to total mechanical work during take-off in common raven and Harris hawks and close to the maximum work predicted for skeletal muscle.

    “The work output from the muscles (66 J kg -1 ) is also close to the total mechanical work required from the muscles during take-off flights in common raven [48 J kg -1 (Jackson and Dial, 2011)] and Harris hawks [56 J kg -1 (Askew et al., 2001)], and close to the maximum work skeletal muscles are predicted to be capable of generating (Peplowski and Marsh, 1997).”

    From The elaborate plumage in peacocks is not such a drag (2014) · cites this paper as Jackson and Dial, 2011

  • The total power measured during take-off was close to maximal power values reported for other bird species: 395 W/kg in magpie, 350 W/kg in grey jay, and 390 W/kg in blue-breasted quail.

    “the total power is close to the maximal power reported in other species [395 W kg -1 in magpie, 350 W kg -1 in grey jay (Jackson and Dial, 2011); 390 W kg -1 in blue breasted quail (Askew et al., 2001)].”

    From The elaborate plumage in peacocks is not such a drag (2014) · cites this paper as Jackson and Dial, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jackson, B. E., & Dial, K. P.
Affiliations
University of Montana (US)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
214
Issue
3
Pages
452-461
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2003244152
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
Corvidae, take-off, mechanical power output, muscle power, body size scaling, wingbeat frequency, pectoralis muscle, muscle stress, muscle strain, sonomicrometry, avian flight mechanics
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Electromyography, Energy Metabolism, Flight, Animal, Locomotion, Muscle Contraction, Pectoralis Muscles, Wings, Animal, Passeriformes, Body Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review