Cited by 26Animal Behavior and ReproductionBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsAvian ecology and behavior

The elaborate plumage in peacocks is not such a drag

Open access
Askew, Graham N.·2014·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

One of the classic examples of an exaggerated sexually selected trait is the elaborate plumage that forms the train in male peafowl Pavo cristatus (peacock). Such ornaments are thought to reduce locomotor performance as a result of their weight and aerodynamic drag, but this cost is unknown. Here, the effect that the train has on take-off flight in peacocks was quantified as the sum of the rates of change of the potential and kinetic energies of the body (PCoM) in birds with trains and following the train's removal. There was no significant difference between PCoM in birds with and without a train. The train incurs drag during take-off; however, while this produces a twofold increase in parasite drag, parasite power only accounts for 0.1% of the total aerodynamic power. The train represented 6.9% of body weight and is expected to increase induced power. The absence of a detectable effect on take-off performance does not necessarily mean that there is no cost associated with possessing such ornate plumage; rather, it suggests that given the variation in take-off performance per se, the magnitude of any effect of the train has little meaningful functional relevance.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The peacock’s train does not significantly impair take-off flight performance in this study, despite increasing parasite drag and adding mass. The author concludes that any cost of the train is small and of limited functional relevance to take-off.

Key findings

  • Total mass-specific centre-of-mass power during take-off was not significantly different between birds with trains and after train removal (222.6±43.3 vs 210.0±25.5 W kg⁻¹; t₄=0.41, ns).
  • Total aerodynamic power was also not significantly different (414.1±31.2 vs 393.3±27.1 W kg⁻¹; t₄=0.55, ns), although parasite power was significantly higher with the train (0.4±0.05 vs 0.2±0.03 W kg⁻¹; t₄=−2.63, P=0.013).
  • At the mean flight velocity of 4 m s⁻¹, drag on the train was 0.12–0.15 N; this produced a twofold increase in parasite drag, but parasite power accounted for only 0.1% of total aerodynamic power. The train represented 6.9% of body mass.
  • Estimated train production cost was 17.5 MJ, or about 96.3 kJ day⁻¹, representing ~10% of basal metabolic rate and 3% of field metabolic rate.

Methods

  • Five mature adult male Indian peafowl (*Pavo cristatus*) were flown in a flight arena; flights were recorded with two synchronised high-speed video cameras at 125 frames s⁻¹, both with the train present and after its removal.
  • Take-off performance was quantified as the sum of rates of change of potential and kinetic energy of the body (P_CoM), with aerodynamic power components estimated using an aerodynamic model; wind tunnel tests measured forces on the train at angles of 0, −10 and −20 deg and free-stream velocities of 3.6–8 m s⁻¹.
  • Flight performance variables and aerodynamic power components were analysed using paired t-tests with Bonferroni–Holm correction for multiple comparisons.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the absence of a detectable effect does not necessarily mean there is no cost; other potential costs include effects on moment of inertia and flight control, running performance, and feather production, and these could be subtle and cumulative.
  • The paper states that flights were performed in a familiar arena using captive-bred birds, conditions that could potentially compromise performance, and whether flights were maximal is not known, though power and work outputs were close to maxima reported in other species.
  • Evident from the text: the sample was small (five individuals), and train removal involved cutting feathers rather than a sham manipulation, which may limit generalisability and control.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.107474

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 15 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    The cost of feather production is estimated at 54.9 kJ per gram of dry feathers.

    “The cost of feather production, C f , is estimated to be 54.9 kJ g -1 dry feathers [following Lindstrom et al. (Lindstrom et al., 1993) and using an estimate of basal metabolic rate from Lasiewski and Dawson (Lasiewski and Dawson, 1967)].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lindstrom et al., 1993 source
    • cites Lasiewski and Dawson, 1967 source
  • Findingown data
    § Take-off performance

    The rate of change of potential energy did not differ significantly between peacocks with and without a train.

    “The rate of change of potential energy was not significantly different between the two conditions (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The train caused a significant twofold increase in parasite power.

    “This results in a significant, twofold increase in parasite power”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Abstract

    Parasite power made up only 0.1% of the total aerodynamic power required for take-off.

    “parasite power only accounts for 0.1% of the total aerodynamic power.”
    • Also stated in: § DISCUSSION · plain
      “as parasite power only represents 0.1% of the total aerodynamic power requirements”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The expected effect of increased mass on induced power and flight performance was not detected.

    “However, this effect was not detected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 12
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    Because the train is produced over about six months, its production cost is estimated at 96.3 kJ per day, about 10% of basal metabolic rate and 3% of field metabolic rate.

    “The train is produced over ~6 months (M.Caunce, personal communication), such that the train production costs are estimated to be 96.3 kJ day -1 , representing ~10% of basal metabolic rate [947 kJ day -1 (Lasiewski and Dawson, 1967)] and 3% of field metabolic rate [2805 kJ day -1 , estimated from a scaling equation for Galliformes (Nagy et al., 1999)].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites M.Caunce, personal communication

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lasiewski and Dawson, 1967 source
    • cites Nagy et al., 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The train in this study weighed 320 g, giving an estimated production cost of 17.5 MJ.

    “The mass of the train in this study was 320 g, giving an estimated cost of producing the train of 17.5 MJ.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Aerodynamic power

    Profile power and the power needed to generate induced velocity did not differ significantly between peacocks with and without a train.

    “Profile power and the power required to generate the induced velocity were not significantly different between the two conditions (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Drag on the train depends on flight velocity and on the angle at which the train is held relative to the bird's flight path.

    “The drag on the train depends on flight velocity and the angle at which it is held relative to the flight trajectory of the bird (Fig. 2) (see also Evans and Thomas, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Evans and Thomas, 1992 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Take-off performance

    Take-off velocity and velocity at the end of the second wingstroke did not differ significantly between peacocks with and without a train.

    “The velocity of the bird at take-off and the flight velocity of the peafowl at the end of the second wingstroke were not significantly different between the two treatments (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Aerodynamic forces on the peafowl train

    Drag on the peafowl train rose linearly with air velocity at each tested angle and was greatest at steeper angles.

    “The drag on the train increased linearly with increasing air velocity for each angle and was highest at steeper angles (Fig. 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    Increasing body mass is expected to raise induced power and thereby reduce flight performance through a decrease in centre-of-mass power.

    “Increasing body mass is expected to increase induced power (through increases in thrust and induced velocity), and therefore to decrease flight performance via a reduction in P CoM .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § DISCUSSION

    It is not known whether the recorded flights were maximal.

    “Whether these flights were maximal is not known”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § DISCUSSION

    The high power output and work generated by the flight muscles indicate that the recorded flights were likely very close to maximal and performed with similar effort.

    “Together, the high power output and work generated by the flight muscles suggest that the flights obtained for each individual were likely very close to maximal, and performed with a similar level of effort.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The potential costs of the train are not mutually exclusive, each could be subtle and hard to detect, and ultimate fitness costs could arise from their cumulative effect on locomotor performance.

    “None of these potential costs are mutually exclusive and all could individually be relatively subtle and difficult to detect: the ultimate fitness costs could be the result of the cumulative effect of each of these factors on locomotor performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § DISCUSSION

    Several other sexually selected traits have been reported to have rather subtle effects on bird locomotor performance.

    “There are several other examples of sexually selected traits having rather subtle effects on bird locomotor performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Comparative and statistical analyses

    Flight performance variables and aerodynamic power components were compared using paired t-tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple comparisons.

    “Flight performance variables and aerodynamic power components were analysed using paired t-tests with significance levels adjusted using the Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple comparisons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § DISCUSSION

    The flights took place in a familiar flight arena using captive-bred birds, conditions that could potentially compromise performance.

    “The flights were performed in a flight arena with which the birds were familiar, using captive-bred birds.These are conditions that could potentially compromise performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Although added mass must affect induced power requirements, the size of that effect has little meaningful functional relevance given the high variability in individual take-off performance.

    “Together, these findings suggest that although added mass must affect the induced power requirements, the magnitude of the effect has little meaningful functional relevance (given the high variability in individual take-off performance per se; Table 2, Fig. 1A) (Macleod, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Macleod, 2006 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Flight arena and filming set-up

    The flight arena volume was calibrated using the direct linear transformation method.

    “The flight arena volume was calibrated using the direct linear transformation method (Hedrick, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hedrick, 2008 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Kinematic and aerodynamic analysis of flight

    For each bird, the flight with the highest centre-of-mass power in each treatment was selected for statistical comparison because differences are most likely to appear during maximal effort.

    “For each individual, the flight with the highest P CoM for the two treatments was selected for statistical comparisons, as any potential differences in performance are most likely to be apparent during maximal effort flights.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Conclusions

    The peacock's train is often cited as a classic example of a costly product of sexual selection.

    “The peacock's train is often cited as a classic example of a 'costly' product of sexual selection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § DISCUSSION

    Vertical display flights by collared doves have been estimated to incur a relatively low metabolic cost of about 5% of basal metabolic rate.

    “The vertical display flights performed by collared doves (Streptopelia decaocto) have been estimated to incur a relatively low metabolic cost (~5% of basal metabolic rate) (Usherwood, 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Usherwood, 2008 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § DISCUSSION

    The work output from the flight muscles, 66 J/kg, was close to total mechanical work during take-off in common raven and Harris hawks and close to the maximum work predicted for skeletal muscle.

    “The work output from the muscles (66 J kg -1 ) is also close to the total mechanical work required from the muscles during take-off flights in common raven [48 J kg -1 (Jackson and Dial, 2011)] and Harris hawks [56 J kg -1 (Askew et al., 2001)], and close to the maximum work skeletal muscles are predicted to be capable of generating (Peplowski and Marsh, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Jackson and Dial, 2011 source
    • cites Askew et al., 2001 source
    • cites Peplowski and Marsh, 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § RESEARCH ARTICLE

    Any costs of possessing an ornate train are small and have limited meaningful functional significance for take-off performance.

    “any such costs are small with limited meaningful functional significance to take-off performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
20 of 20

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Askew found that the train did not reduce take off flight performance in peacocks.

    “Recently, Askew19 found that the train did not reduce take off flight performance”
  • There is a surprising lack of evidence to support the idea that locomotion in peacocks is in some way affected by sexually selected traits.

    “However, there is a surprising lack of evidence to support the idea that locomotion in peacocks is in some way affected by sexually selected traits19.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Train aerodynamic power differs between text and Table 2

    Minor

    The text reports mean aerodynamic power with a train as 414.1 W kg−1, while Table 2 reports 414.3 W kg−1 for the same condition.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hoyo, 1994, Handbook of Birds of the World

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Askew, G. N.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Askew, Graham N.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
217
Issue
18
Pages
3237-3241
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2142727208
Cited by
26
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Loughborough University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
peacock, Pavo cristatus, plumage, sexual selection, aerodynamic drag, parasite drag, induced power, body weight, locomotor performance, energy expenditure
MeSH terms
Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Feathers, Flight, Animal, Male, Sex Characteristics, Galliformes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review