Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How muscle fiber lengths and velocities affect muscle force generation as humans walk and run at different speeds

Open access
Arnold, Edith M., Hamner, Samuel R., Seth, Ajay, Millard, Matthew, Delp, Scott L.·2013·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Summary: The lengths and velocities of muscle fibers have a dramatic effect on muscle force generation. It is unknown, however, whether the lengths and velocities of lower limb muscle fibers substantially affect the ability of muscles to generate force during walking and running. We examined this issue by developing simulations of muscle-tendon dynamics that calculate the lengths and velocities of muscle fibers from electromyographic recordings of eleven lower limb muscles and kinematic measurements of the hip, knee, and ankle made as five subjects walked at speeds of 1.0-1.75 m/s and ran at speeds of 2.0-5.0 m/s. We analyzed the simulated fiber lengths, fiber velocities, and forces to evaluate the influence of force-length and force-velocity properties on force generation at different walking and running speeds. The simulations revealed that force generation ability (i.e., the force generated per unit of activation) of eight of the eleven muscles was significantly affected by walking or running speed. Soleus force generation ability decreased with increasing walking speed, but the transition from walking to running increased the force generation ability by reducing fiber velocities. Our results demonstrate the influence of soleus muscle architecture on the walk-to-run transition and the effects of muscle-tendon compliance on the plantarflexors' ability to generate ankle moment and power. The study presents data that permit lower limb muscles to be studied in unprecedented detail by relating muscle fiber dynamics and force generation to the mechanical demands of walking and running.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.075697

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Arnold, E. M., Hamner, S. R., Seth, A., Millard, M., & Delp, S. L.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
216
Issue
Pt 11
Pages
2150-60
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2078370135
Cited by
261
References
52
FWCI
9.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How muscle fiber lengths and velocities affect muscle force generation as humans walk and run at different speeds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.075697
The paper
Arnold, E. M., Hamner, S. R., Seth, A., Millard, M., & Delp, S. L. (2013). How muscle fiber lengths and velocities affect muscle force generation as humans walk and run at different speeds. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.075697

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.