Cited by 100Animal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship

Open access
Yorzinski, Jessica L., Patricelli, Gail L., Babcock, Jason S., Pearson, John M., Platt, Michael L.·2013·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

Conspicuous, multicomponent ornamentation in male animals can be favored by female mate choice but we know little about the cognitive processes females use to evaluate these traits. Sexual selection may favor attention mechanisms allowing the choosing females to selectively and efficiently acquire relevant information from complex male display traits and, in turn, may favor male display traits that effectively capture and hold female attention. Using a miniaturized telemetric gaze-tracker, we show that peahens (Pavo cristatus) selectively attend to specific components of peacock courtship displays and virtually ignore other, highly conspicuous components. Females gazed at the lower train but largely ignored the head, crest and upper train. When the lower train was obscured, however, females spent more time gazing at the upper train and approached the upper train from a distance. Our results suggest that peahens mainly evaluate the lower train during close-up courtship but use the upper train as a long-distance attraction signal. Furthermore, we found that behavioral display components (train rattling and wing shaking) captured and maintained female attention, indicating that interactions between display components may promote the evolution of multicomponent displays. Taken together, these findings suggest that selective attention plays a crucial role in sexual selection and likely influences the evolution of male display traits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.087338

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Manning J. T. (1987). The peacock's train and the age-dependency model of female choice. J. World Pheasant Ass. 12, 44-56 [Google Scholar]
  2. Smith J. D., Vertegaal R., Sohn C. (2005). ViewPointer: lightweight calibration-free eye tracking for ubiquitous handfree deixis. In Proceedings of UIST 2005, pp. 53-61 [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yorzinski, J. L., Patricelli, G. L., Babcock, J. S., Pearson, J. M., & Platt, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Positive Science, LLC, New York City, NY 10028, USA
Corresponding author
Yorzinski, Jessica L.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2013-08-15
Volume
216
Issue
16
Pages
3035-3046
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W1969326654
Cited by
100
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH096875)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
selective attention, female mate choice, sexual selection, male ornamentation, gaze behavior, Pavo cristatus
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Birds, Courtship, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Male, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Telemetry, Visual Perception, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review