Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference
Abstract
Emotions operate along the dimension of approach and aversion, and it is reasonable to assume that orienting behavior is intrinsically linked to emotionally involved processes such as preference decisions. Here we describe a gaze 'cascade effect' that was present when human observers were shown pairs of human faces and instructed to decide which face was more attractive. Their gaze was initially distributed evenly between the two stimuli, but then gradually shifted toward the face that they eventually chose. Gaze bias was significantly weaker in a face shape discrimination task. In a second series of experiments, manipulation of gaze duration, but not exposure duration alone, biased observers' preference decisions. We thus conclude that gaze is actively involved in preference formation. The gaze cascade effect was also present when participants compared abstract, unfamiliar shapes for attractiveness, suggesting that orienting and preference for objects in general are intrinsically linked in a positive feedback loop leading to the conscious choice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gaze bias appears to both reflect and influence preferences.
“Indeed, gaze bias appears to both reflect and influence preferences51”
From Paying attention to attention in depression (2019) · cites this paper as [51]
Cites
Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
Zajonc, R. B. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025848 · Cited by 6,745 · see citing works
JAMES, W. (1884) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/os-ix.34.188 · Cited by 3,446 · see citing works
James, W. (2005) · Williams & Wilkins eBooks · doi:10.1037/10735-001 · Cited by 2,221 · see citing works
The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze
Emery, N. J. (2000) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00025-7 · Cited by 2,037 · see citing works
Gaze and eye contact: a research review
Kleinke, C. L. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78 · Cited by 1,455 · see citing works
Affective Discrimination of Stimuli That Cannot Be Recognized
Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7352271 · Cited by 1,213 · see citing works
The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State
Schachter, S. (1964) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60048-9 · Cited by 1,186 · see citing works
What minds have in common is space: Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy
Butterworth, G. E., & Jarrett, N. (1991) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1991.tb00862.x · Cited by 950 · see citing works
Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects
Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T. R., & Blanz, V. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/82947 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates
Sakai, K., & Miyashita, Y. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/354152a0 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
Fantz, R. L. (1961) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0561-66 · Cited by 614 · see citing works
Laird, J. D. (1974) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036125 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized.
Mandler, G., Nakamura, Y., & Zandt, B. J. V. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.646 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Morris, P. E., & Hampson, P. J. (1983) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 388 · see citing works
The Detection of Gaze Direction: A Stare-In-The-Crowd Effect
von Grünau, M. W., & Anston, C. (1995) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p241297 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Emotion and Facial Efference: A Theory Reclaimed
Zajonc, R. B. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3883492 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange.
Patterson, M. L. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.3.231 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Preferential-looking assessment of fusion and stereopsis in infants aged 1-6 months.
Birch, E. E., Shimojo, S., & Held, R. M. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationStress hormones and brain aging: adding injury to insult?
Porter, N. M., & Landfield, P. W. (1998) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/196 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Neuroanatomical correlates of the assessment of facial attractiveness
Nakamura, K., Kawashima, R., Nagumo, S., Ito, K., Sugiura, M., Kato, T., Nakamura, A., Hatano, K., Kubota, K., Fukuda, H., et al. (1998) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199803090-00035 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
An fMRI investigation of visual preference habituation
Vessel, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/2.7.492 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Brooksbank, C. (2001) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/35094025 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice
Krajbich, I., Armel, C., & Rangel, A. (2010) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2635 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making
Orquin, J. L., & Loose, S. M. (2013) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Krajbich, I. M., & Rangel, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1101328108 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook
Plaßmann, H., Ramsøy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.010 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Hare, T. A., Malmaud, J., & Rangel, A. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.6383-10.2011 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Leder, H., & Nadal, M. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12084 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Biasing simple choices by manipulating relative visual attention
Armel, K. C., Beaumel, A., & Rangel, A. (2008) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500000413 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture
Vartanian, O. A., Navarrete, G., Chatterjee, A. K., Fich, L. B., Leder, H., Modroño, C., Nadal, M., Rostrup, N., & Skov, M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1301227110 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
On The Use of Neurophysiological Tools in Is Research: Developing A Research Agenda for Neurois1
Dimoka, A., Banker, R. D., Benbasat, I., Davis, F. D., Dennis, A. R., Gefen, D., Gupta, A., Ischebeck, A. K., Kenning, Pavlou, P. A., et al. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703475 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice
Milosavljevic, M., Navalpakkam, V., Christof Koch, A., & Rangel, A. (2011) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.002 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Decoding subjective decisions from orbitofrontal cortex
Rich, E. L., & Wallis, J. D. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4320 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
The Attentional Drift-Diffusion Model Extends to Simple Purchasing Decisions
Krajbich, I. M., Lu, D., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00193 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Lim, S.-L., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1246-11.2011 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Eye Tracking for Visual Marketing
Wedel, M., & Pieters, R. G. M. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Marketing · doi:10.1561/1700000011 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Paying attention to attention in depression
Keller, A. S., Leikauf, J. E., Holt-Gosselin, B., Staveland, B. R., & Williams, L. M. (2019) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0616-1 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice
Atalay, S., Bodur, H., & Rasolofoarison, D. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/665984 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Wolfgang Einhäuser, A., Rutishauser, U., & Christof Koch, A. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.2.2 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Risko, E. F., Laidlaw, K., Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. F. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00143 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression☆
Bayliss, A. P., Frischen, A., FENSKE, M., & Tipper, S. P. (2006) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.012 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes.
Cavanagh, J. F., Wiecki, T. V., Kochar, A., & Frank, M. J. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0035813 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Threats to the validity of eye-movement research in psychology
Orquin, J. L., & Holmqvist, K. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0998-z · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Neuroeconomic Foundations of Economic Choice—Recent Advances
Fehr, E., & Rangel, A. (2011) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.25.4.3 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
A meta-analytic review of two modes of learning and the description-experience gap.
Wulff, D. U., Mergenthaler, M., & Hertwig, R. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000115 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2022) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-051520-011616 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Towal, R. B., Mormann, M. M., & Christof Koch, A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1304429110 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Gaze cuing and affective judgments of objects: I like what you look at
Bayliss, A. P., Paul, M. A., Cannon, P. R., & Tipper, S. P. (2006) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03213926 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
The Dynamics of Decision Making in Risky Choice: An Eye-Tracking Analysis
Fiedler, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00335 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Cognitive and emotional engagement while learning with VR: The perspective of multimodal methodology
Dubovi, I. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104495 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Eye movement monitoring as a process tracing methodology in decision making research.
Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics · doi:10.1037/a0020692 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Social cognitive neuroscience: where are we heading?
Blakemore, S.-J., Winston, J., & Frith, U. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.03.012 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Beauty and the beholder: Highly individual taste for abstract, but not real-world images
Vessel, E. A. (2010) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/10.2.18 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Do you like what you see? The role of first fixation and total fixation duration in consumer choice
van der Laan, L. N., Hooge, I. T. C., de Ridder, D. T. D., Viergever, M. A., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2014) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.015 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze
Pärnamets, P., Johansson, P., Hall, L., Balkenius, C., Spivey, M. J., & Richardson, D. C. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1415250112 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Gaze Amplifies Value in Decision Making
Smith, S. M., & Krajbich, I. M. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618810521 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Areas of Interest as a Signal Detection Problem in Behavioral Eye‐Tracking Research
Orquin, J. L., Ashby, N. J. S., & Clarke, A. D. F. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1867 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Using Visual Design to Improve Customer Perceptions of Online Assortments
Kahn, B. E. (2016) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.11.004 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Gidlöf, K., Wallin, A., Dewhurst, R., & Holmqvist, K. (2013) · Journal of Eye Movement Research · doi:10.16910/jemr.6.1.3 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Accounting for attention in sequential sampling models of decision making
Krajbich, I. (2019) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.10.008 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives
Gluth, S., Kern, N., Kortmann, M., & Vitali, C. L. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0822-0 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
George, N., & Conty, L. (2008) · Neurophysiologie Clinique · doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2008.03.001 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Summerfield, C., & Tsetsos, K. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00070 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Shi, S. W., Wedel, M., & Pieters, F. G. M. (2012) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1625 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Gidlöf, K., Anikin, A., Lingonblad, M., & Wallin, A. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.020 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change
Schonberg, T., Bakkour, A., Hover, A. M., Mumford, J. A., Nagar, L., Perez, J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3673 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Amount and time exert independent influences on intertemporal choice
Amasino, D. R., Sullivan, N., Kranton, R., & Huettel, S. A. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0537-2 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Understanding cognitive and affective mechanisms in social psychology through eye-tracking
Rahal, R.-M., & Fiedler, S. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103842 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions
Kim, H., Adolphs, R., O’Doherty, J. P., & Shinsuke Shimojo, A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0703101104 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Stewart, N., Hermens, F., & Matthews, W. J. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.1854 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Guo, F., Ding, Y., Liu, W., Liu, C., & Zhang, X. (2016) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2015.12.001 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
What they see is what they get? An fMRI‐study on neural correlates of attractive packaging
Stoll, M., Baecke, S., & Kenning, P. H. (2008) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.256 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Multialternative decision by sampling: A model of decision making constrained by process data.
Noguchi, T., & Stewart, N. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000102 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Roesch, E. B., Tamarit, L., Revéret, L., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2010) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-010-0095-9 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Meißner, M., Musalem, A., & Huber, J. C. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0467 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Bell, L., Vogt, J., Willemse, C., Routledge, T., Butler, L. T., & Sakaki, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01655 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Noguchi, T., & Stewart, N. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.006 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
The Attentional Drift Diffusion Model of Simple Perceptual Decision-Making
Tavares, G., Perona, P., & Rangel, A. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00468 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Pfeiffer, J., Pfeiffer, T., Meißner, M., & Weiß, E. (2020) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2019.0907 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average.
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Unger, L., Little, A. C., & Feinberg, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1420 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling
Callaway, F., Rangel, A., & Griffiths, T. L. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
The default-mode network represents aesthetic appeal that generalizes across visual domains
Vessel, E. A., Isik, A. I., Belfi, A. M., Stahl, J. L., & Starr, G. G. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1902650116 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making
Gluth, S., Spektor, M. S., & Rieskamp, J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.39659 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Prospect theory reflects selective allocation of attention.
Pachur, T., Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, M., Murphy, R. O., & Hertwig, R. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000406 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Attention and choice across domains.
Smith, S. M., & Krajbich, I. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000482 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Webcam-based online eye-tracking for behavioral research
Yang, X., & Krajbich, I. M. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008512 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Watson, K. K., & Platt, M. L. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.10.016 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
The case against economic values in the orbitofrontal cortex (or anywhere else in the brain).
Hayden, B. Y., & Niv, Y. (2021) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/bne0000448 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Eye-tracking research on sensory and consumer science: A review, pitfalls and future directions
Motoki, K., Saito, T. I., & Onuma, T. (2021) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110389 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Gender and Visibility of Sexual Cues Influence Eye Movements While Viewing Faces and Bodies
Nummenmaa, L., Hietanen, J. K., Santtila, P. O., & Hyönä, J. (2012) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9911-0 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks
Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2008) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506280802362962 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Gaze behaviour during space perception and spatial decision making
Wiener, J. M., Hölscher, C., Büchner, S. J., & Konieczny, L. (2011) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0397-5 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference
Simion, C., & Shinsuke Shimojo, A. (2006) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.019 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationOrbitofrontal Cortex Value Signals Depend on Fixation Location during Free Viewing
McGinty, V. B., Rangel, A., & Newsome, W. T. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.045 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
The Pugh Controlled Convergence method: model-based evaluation and implications for design theory
Frey, D., Herder, P., Wijnia, Y. C., Subrahmanian, E., Katsikopoulos, K. V., & Clausing, D. P. (2008) · Research in Engineering Design · doi:10.1007/s00163-008-0056-z · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Simola, J., Salojärvi, J., & Kojo, I. (2008) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.01.002 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Gaze bias: Selective encoding and liking effects
Schotter, E. R., Berry, R. W., McKenzie, C. R. M., & Rayner, K. (2010) · Visual Cognition · doi:10.1080/13506281003668900 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
When attractiveness demands longer looks: The effects of situation and gender
Leder, H., Tinio, P. P. L., Fuchs, I., & Bohrn, I. C. (2010) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470211003605142 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour
Thomas, A. W., Molter, F., Krajbich, I. M., Heekeren, H. R., & Mohr, P. N. C. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0584-8 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Through their eyes: selective attention in peahens during courtship
Yorzinski, J. L., Patricelli, G. L., Babcock, J. S., Pearson, J. M., & Platt, M. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.087338 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: A further test of the gaze cascade model
Glaholt, M. G., & Reingold, E. M. (2009) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.71.3.445 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
An analysis of process-tracing research on consumer decision-making
Zuschke, N. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.028 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
The Computation of Stimulus Values in Simple Choice
Rangel, A., & Clithero, J. A. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416008-8.00008-5 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Goal-directed visual attention drives health goal priming: An eye-tracking experiment.
van der Laan, L. N., Papies, E. K., Hooge, I. T. C., & Smeets, P. A. M. (2016) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000410 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Yoo, S. B. M., Hayden, B. Y., & Pearson, J. M. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0664 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Taufique, K. M. R. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2020.1866645 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Noland, R. B., Weiner, M. D., Gao, D., Cook, M. P., & Nelessen, A. C. (2016) · Journal of Urbanism International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability · doi:10.1080/17549175.2016.1187197 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
How Beauty Determines Gaze! Facial Attractiveness and Gaze Duration in Images of Real World Scenes
Leder, H., Mitrovic, A., & Goller, J. (2016) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669516664355 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Carbon labels on restaurant menus: do people pay attention to them?
Babakhani, N., Lee, A., & Dolničar, S. (2019) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2019.1670187 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2014) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0618-0 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study?
Leder, H. (2013) · Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts · doi:10.1037/a0031585 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Have an eye on the buckled cucumber: An eye tracking study on visually suboptimal foods
Helmert, J. R., Symmank, C., Pannasch, S., & Rohm, H. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.009 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Richards, M. R., Fields, H. W., Beck, F. M., Firestone, A. R., Walther, D. B., Rosenstiel, S., & Sacksteder, J. M. (2015) · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.12.016 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Focusing on what you own: Biased information uptake due to ownership
Ashby, N. J. S., Dickert, S., & Glöckner, A. (2012) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500002230 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Simion, C., & Shinsuke Shimojo, A. (2007) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193916 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citationKonovalov, A., & Krajbich, I. M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12438 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
The Power of Attention: Using Eye Gaze to Predict Other-Regarding and Moral Choices
Ghaffari, M., & Fiedler, S. (2018) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797618799301 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Effects of subjective preference of colors on attention-related occipital theta oscillations
Kawasaki, M., & Yamaguchi, Y. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.042 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Identifying processes underlying the multimedia effect in testing: An eye-movement analysis
Lindner, M. A., Eitel, A., Strobel, B., & Köller, O. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.10.007 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods
Schulte‐Mecklenbeck, M., Kühberger, A., & Johnson, J. G. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315160559 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Recent updates of eye movement abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia: A scoping review
Wolf, A., Ueda, K., & Hirano, Y. (2020) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.13188 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces
Valuch, C., Pflüger, L. S., Wallner, B., Laeng, B., & Ulrich Ansorge, A. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00042 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Bunkyo Gakuin University (JP)
- Venue
- Nature Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-11-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1317-1322
- ISSN
- 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1546-1726
- OpenAlex
- W2115276604
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- gaze bias, cascading effects, preference formation, facial attractiveness, orienting, gaze duration, positive feedback loop, visual attention
- MeSH terms
- Choice Behavior, Discrimination, Psychological, Emotions, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
