The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determinants of preferred ground clearance during swing phase of human walking
Abstract
During each step of human walking, the swing foot passes close to the ground with a small but (usually) non-zero clearance. The foot can occasionally scuff against the ground, with some risk of stumbling or tripping. The risk might be mitigated simply by lifting the foot higher, but presumably at increased effort, of unknown amount. Perhaps the normally preferred ground clearance is a trade-off between competing costs, one for lifting the foot higher, and one for scuffing it. We tested this by measuring the metabolic energy cost of lifting and scuffing the foot, treating these apparently dissimilar behaviors as part of a single continuum, where scuffing is a form of negative foot lift. We measured young, healthy adults (N=9) lifting or scuffing the foot by various amounts mid-swing during treadmill walking, and observed substantial costs, each well capable of doubling the net metabolic rate for normal walking (gross cost minus that for standing). In relative terms, the cost for scuffing increased over twice as steeply as that for lifting. That relative difference means that the expected value of cost, which takes into account movement variability, occurs at a non-zero mean clearance, approximately matching the preferred clearance we observed. Energy cost alone is only a lower bound on the overall disadvantages of inadvertent ground contact, but it is sufficient to show how human behavior may be determined not only by the separate costs of different trade-offs, but also movement variability, which can influence the average cost actually experienced in practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The latter is consistent with controlled experiments showing a high cost for increased clearance [21].”
From Human walking in the real world: interactions between terrain type, gait parameters, and energy expenditure (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Barrett, 2010, A systematic review of the effect of ageing and falls history on minimum foot clearance characteristics during level walking, Gait Posture, 32, 429, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.07.010 · DOI
- Begg, 2006, Ageing effects on knee and ankle joint angles at key events and phases of the gait cycle, J. Med. Eng. Technol., 30, 382, 10.1080/03091900500445353 · DOI
- Begg, 2007, Minimum foot clearance during walking: strategies for the minimisation of trip-related falls, Gait Posture, 25, 191, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.03.008 · DOI
- Best, 2008, A method for calculating the probability of tripping while walking, J. Biomech., 41, 1147, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.11.023 · DOI
- Brockway, 1987, Derivation of formulae used to calculate energy expenditure in man, Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr., 41, 463
- Cruz, 2009, Impact of ankle-foot-orthosis on frontal plane behaviors post-stroke, Gait Posture, 30, 312, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.018 · DOI
- De Asha, 2015, The effects of walking speed on minimum toe clearance and on the temporal relationship between minimum clearance and peak swing-foot velocity in unilateral trans-tibial amputees, Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 39, 120, 10.1177/0309364613515493 · DOI
- Dean, 2009, Elastic coupling of limb joints enables faster bipedal walking, J. R. Soc. Interface, 6, 561, 10.1098/rsif.2008.0415 · DOI
- Dean, 2011, Energetic costs of producing muscle work and force in a cyclical human bouncing task, J. Appl. Physiol., 110, 873, 10.1152/japplphysiol.00505.2010 · DOI
- Doke, 2007, Energetic cost of producing cyclic muscle force, rather than work, to swing the human leg, J. Exp. Biol., 210, 2390, 10.1242/jeb.02782 · DOI
- Doke, 2005, Mechanics and energetics of swinging the human leg, J. Exp. Biol., 208, 439, 10.1242/jeb.01408 · DOI · Paper page
- Donelan, 2001, Mechanical and metabolic determinants of the preferred step width in human walking, Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 268, 1985, 10.1098/rspb.2001.1761 · DOI · Paper page
- Donelan, 2002, Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking, J. Biomech., 35, 117, 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00169-5 · DOI
- Elftman, 1966, Biomechanics of muscle with particular application to studies of gait, J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 48, 363, 10.2106/00004623-196648020-00017 · DOI · Paper page
- Gates, 2012, Kinematic strategies for walking across a destabilizing rock surface, Gait Posture, 35, 36, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.08.001 · DOI
- Glantz, 2005, Primer of Biostatistics
- Kerrigan, 2000, Hip hiking and circumduction: quantitative definitions, Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 79, 247, 10.1097/00002060-200005000-00006 · DOI
- Kuo, 2002, Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model, J. Biomech. Eng., 124, 113, 10.1115/1.1427703 · DOI
- Papoulis, 2002, Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes
- Ralston, 1958, Energy-speed relation and optimal speed during level walking, Int. Z. Angew. Physiol., 17, 277, 10.1007/bf00698754 · DOI · Paper page
- Schulz, 2010, The effects of everyday concurrent tasks on overground minimum toe clearance and gait parameters, Gait Posture, 32, 18, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.013 · DOI
- Voloshina, 2013, Biomechanics and energetics of walking on uneven terrain, J. Exp. Biol., 216, 3963, 10.1242/jeb.081711 · DOI · Paper page
- Winter, 2004, Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement
- Winter, 1992, Foot trajectory in human gait: a precise and multifactorial motor control task, Phys. Ther., 72, 45, 10.1093/ptj/72.1.45 · DOI
- Winters, 2000, Study movement selection and synergies via a synthesized neuro-optimization framework, Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement, 458, 10.1007/978-1-4612-2104-3_36 · DOI
- Zelik, 2010, Human walking isn't all hard work: evidence of soft tissue contributions to energy dissipation and return, J. Exp. Biol., 213, 4257, 10.1242/jeb.044297 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kowalsky, D. B., Rebula, J. R., Ojeda, L. V., Adamczyk, P. G., & Kuo, A. D. (2021) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228682 · Cited by 106
Self-citationThe energetic cost of human walking as a function of uneven terrain amplitude
Hosseini-Yazdi, S.-S., & Kuo, A. D. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.249840 · Cited by 10
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, A. R., & Kuo, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A
- ORCID
- Wu, Amy R.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2016-01-01
- ISSN
- 1477-9145
- 0022-0949
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Office of Naval Research (ETOWL program)
- National Institutes of Health (AG030815)
- U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH-09-2-0142, National Defense Science & Engineering Graduate Fellowship Program)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review