The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limitations on Animal Flight Performance
Abstract
Flight performance seems to change systematically with body size: small animals can hover and fly over a wide range of speeds, but large birds taxi for takeoff and then fly over a narrow speed range. The traditional explanation for this is that the mass-specific power required for flight varies with speed according to a U-shaped curve, and it also scales between m0 and m1/6, where m is body mass. The mass-specific power available from the flight muscles is assumed to scale as m−1/3 As available power decreases with increasing body size, the range of attainable flight speeds becomes progressively reduced until the largest animals can only fly in the trough of the U-shaped curve. Above a particular size, the available power is insufficient and flapping flight is not possible. The underlying assumptions of this argument are examined in this review. Metabolic measurements are more consistent with a J-shaped curve, with little change in power from hovering to intermediate flight speeds, than with a U-shaped curve. Scaling of the mass-specific power required to fly agrees with predictions. The mass-specific power available from, the muscles, estimated from maximal loading studies, varies as m0.13. This scaling cannot be distinguished from that of the power required to fly, refuting the argument that power imposes an intrinsic scaling on flight performance. It is suggested instead that limitations on low-speed performance result from an adverse scaling of lift production with increasing body size
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles.
Close, R. I. (1972) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.129 · Cited by 1,890
Pennycuick, C. J. (1975) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249405-5.50009-4 · Cited by 1,072
Cited by
The ecological costs of avian fat storage
Witter, M. S., & Cuthill, I. C. (1993) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1993.0050 · Cited by 699
Contraction Dynamics and Power Output of Skeletal Muscle
Josephson, R. K. (1993) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002523 · Cited by 364
Lehmann, F.-O., & Dickinson, M. H. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.200.7.1133 · Cited by 320
Muscle Efficiency and Elastic Storage in the Flight Motor of Drosophila
Dickinson, M. H., & Lighton, J. R. B. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7701346 · Cited by 254
Flight Kinematics of Black-Billed Magpies and Pigeons Over a Wide Range of Speeds
Tobalske, B. W., & Dial, K. P. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.199.2.263 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellington, C. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1991-10-01
- Volume
- 160
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-91
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2346145041
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limitations on Animal Flight Performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.160.1.71
- The paper
- Ellington, C. P. (1991). Limitations on Animal Flight Performance. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.160.1.71
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.