The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flight Kinematics of Black-Billed Magpies and Pigeons Over a Wide Range of Speeds
Abstract
To investigate how birds that differ in morphology change their wing and body movements while flying at a range of speeds, we analyzed high-speed (60 Hz) video tapes of black-billed magpies (Pica pica) flying at speeds of 4–14 m s-1 and pigeons (Columba livia) flying at 6–20 m s-1 in a wind-tunnel. Pigeons had higher wing loading and higher-aspect-ratio wings compared with magpies. Both species alternated phases of steady-speed flight with phases of acceleration and deceleration, particularly at intermediate flight speeds. The birds modulated their wingbeat kinematics among these phases and frequently exhibited non-flapping phases while decelerating. Such modulation in kinematics during forward flight is typical of magpies but not of pigeons in the wild. The behavior of the pigeons may have been a response to the reduced power costs for flight in the closed wind-tunnel relative to those for free flight at similar speeds. During steady-speed flight, wingbeat frequency did not change appreciably with increasing flight speed. Body angle relative to the horizontal, the stroke-plane angles of the wingtip and wrist relative to the horizontal and the angle describing tail spread at mid-downstroke all decreased with increasing flight speed, thereby illustrating a shift in the dominant function of wing flapping from weight support at slow speeds to positive thrust at fast speeds. Using wingbeat kinematics to infer lift production, it appeared that magpies used a vortex-ring gait during steady-speed flight at all speeds whereas pigeons used a vortex-ring gait at 6 and 8 m s-1, a transitional vortex-ring gait at 10 m s-1, and a continuous-vortex gait at faster speeds. Both species used a vortex-ring gait for acceleration and a continuous-vortex gait or a non-flapping phase for deceleration during flight at intermediate wind-tunnel speeds. Pigeons progressively flexed their wings during glides as flight speed increased but never performed bounds. Wingspan during glides in magpies did not vary with flight speed, but the percentage of bounds among non-flapping intervals increased with speed from 10 to 14 m s-1. The use of non-flapping wing postures seemed to be related to the gaits used during flapping and to the aspect ratio of the wings. We develop an ‘adverse-scaling’ hypothesis in which it is proposed that the ability to reduce metabolic and mechanical power output using flap-bounding flight at fast flight speeds is scaled negatively with body mass. This represents an alternative to the ‘fixed-gear’ hypothesis previously suggested by other authors to explain the use of intermittent flight in birds. Future comparative studies in the field would be worthwhile, especially if instantaneous flight speeds and within-wingbeat kinematics were documented; new studies in the laboratory should involve simultaneous recording of wing kinematics and aerodynamic forces on the wing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pennycuick, C. J. (1975) · Avian Biology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-249405-5.50009-4 · Cited by 1,072
Scale Effects in Animal Locomotion.
Murray, J. D., & Pedley, T. J. (1978) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530028 · Cited by 1,060
Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates
Alexander, R. M. (1989) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1989.69.4.1199 · Cited by 613
Norberg, U. M. (1990) · Zoophysiology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-83848-4 · Cited by 611
Energetics and Mechanics of Terrestrial Locomotion
Taylor, C. R., & Heglund, N. C. (1982) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.44.030182.000525 · Cited by 610
Bird Flight Performance: A Practical Calculation Manual
Nisbet, C. T., & Pennycuick, C. J. (1992) · Colonial Waterbirds · doi:10.2307/1521371 · Cited by 574
Form and Function in Avian Flight
Rayner, J. M. V. (1988) · Current Ornithology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6787-5_1 · Cited by 534
Maximum lift production during takeoff in flying animals
Marden, J. H. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.130.1.235 · Cited by 441
Vertebrate Flight: Mechanics, Physiology, Morphology, Ecology and Evolution
(1990) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology · doi:10.1016/0300-9629(90)90674-h · Cited by 433
A New Approach to Animal Flight Mechanics
Rayner, J. M. V. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.80.1.17 · Cited by 348
Cited by
Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency
Taylor, G. K., Nudds, R. L., & Thomas, A. L. R. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02000 · Cited by 994
The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta I. Kinematics of hovering and forward flight
Willmott, A. P., & Ellington, C. P. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.200.21.2705 · Cited by 466
Flight Respiration and Energetics
Harrison, J. F., & Roberts, S. P. (2000) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.62.1.179 · Cited by 256
Wing-assisted incline running and the evolution of flight.
Dial, K. P. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1078237 · Cited by 236
Self-citationA fundamental avian wing-stroke provides a new perspective on the evolution of flight
Dial, K. P., Jackson, B. E., & Segre, P. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06517 · Cited by 153
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tobalske, B. W., & Dial, K. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1996-02-01
- Volume
- 199
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 263-280
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2102307969
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 20.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flight Kinematics of Black-Billed Magpies and Pigeons Over a Wide Range of Speeds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.199.2.263
- The paper
- Tobalske, B. W., & Dial, K. P. (1996). Flight Kinematics of Black-Billed Magpies and Pigeons Over a Wide Range of Speeds. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.199.2.263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.