The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Changes in Power Requirements and Muscle Efficiency During Elevated Force Production in the Fruit Fly Drosophila Melanogaster
Abstract
The limits of flight performance have been estimated in tethered Drosophila melanogaster by modulating power requirements in a ‘virtual reality’ flight arena. At peak capacity, the flight muscles can sustain a mechanical power output of nearly 80 W kg−1 muscle mass at 24 °C, which is sufficient to generate forces of approximately 150 % of the animal’s weight. The increase in flight force above that required to support body weight is accompanied by a rise in wing velocity, brought about by an increase in stroke amplitude and a decrease in stroke frequency. Inertial costs, although greater than either profile or induced power, would be minimal with even modest amounts of elastic storage, and total mechanical power energy should be equivalent to aerodynamic power alone. Because of the large profile drag expected at low Reynolds numbers, the profile power was approximately twice the induced power at all levels of force generation. Thus, it is the cost of overcoming drag, and not the production of lift, that is the primary requirement for flight in Drosophila melanogaster. By comparing the estimated mechanical power output with respirometrically measured total power input, we determined that muscle efficiency rises with increasing force production to a maximum of 10 %. This change in efficiency may reflect either increased crossbridge activation or a favorable strain regime during the production of peak forces.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. II. Morphological parameters
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0050 · Cited by 682
Unsteady Aerodynamic Performance of Model Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers
Dickinson, M. H., & Götz, K. G. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.174.1.45 · Cited by 668
Self-citationThe aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. VI. Lift and power requirements
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0054 · Cited by 476
Maximum lift production during takeoff in flying animals
Marden, J. H. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.130.1.235 · Cited by 441
Heisenberg, M., & Wolf, R. (1984) · Studies of Brain Function · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69936-8 · Cited by 400
Contraction Dynamics and Power Output of Skeletal Muscle
Josephson, R. K. (1993) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002523 · Cited by 364
A New Approach to Animal Flight Mechanics
Rayner, J. M. V. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.80.1.17 · Cited by 348
Power Requirements for Horizontal Flight in the Pigeon Columba Livia
Pennycuick, C. J. (1968) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.49.3.527 · Cited by 346
Dragonfly Flight : II. Velocities, Accelerations and Kinematics of Flapping Flight
Wakeling, J. M., & Ellington, C. P. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.200.3.557 · Cited by 308
The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight. V. A vortex theory
Ellington, C. P. (1984) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1984.0053 · Cited by 272
Cited by
The aerodynamics of insect flight
Sane, S. P. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.00663 · Cited by 1,253
A modular display system for insect behavioral neuroscience
Reiser, M. B., & Dickinson, M. H. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.07.019 · Cited by 280
Self-citationCombes, S. A., & Daniel, T. L. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.00502 · Cited by 277
Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing
Vanella, M., Fitzgerald, T., Preidikman, S., Balaras, E., & Balachandran, B. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.016428 · Cited by 261
Dunn-Rankin, D., Leal, E. M., & Walther, D. C. (2005) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2005.04.001 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehmann, F.-O., & Dickinson, M. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1133-1143
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2152012061
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 13.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Changes in Power Requirements and Muscle Efficiency During Elevated Force Production in the Fruit Fly Drosophila Melanogaster. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.200.7.1133
- The paper
- Lehmann, F.-O., & Dickinson, M. H. (1997). The Changes in Power Requirements and Muscle Efficiency During Elevated Force Production in the Fruit Fly Drosophila Melanogaster. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.200.7.1133
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.