Cited by 81Physiological and biochemical adaptationsEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Nitrogen metabolism and excretion in the mangrove killifish Rivulus marmoratus II. Significant ammonia volatilization in a teleost during air-exposure

Frick, N. T., Wright, P. A.·2002·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

The mangrove killifish Rivulus marmoratus can tolerate prolonged periods of air-exposure (>1 month). During these periods of emersion, we hypothesized that R. marmoratus would convert potentially toxic ammonia into urea and free amino acids (FAAs). In air-exposed fish, both ammonia (J(Amm)) and urea (J(Urea)) excretion continued at approximately 57 % and 39 %, respectively, of submerged rates. Remarkably, approximately 42 % of the total ammonia excreted during air-exposure was through NH(3) volatilization. Ammonia did not accumulate in whole-body tissues of air-exposed fish, but levels of both urea and some FAAs (primarily alanine and glutamine) were up to twofold higher after 10 days. The activities of the ornithine-urea cycle enzymes carbamoyl phosphate synthetase III and ornithine transcarbamylase increased (by approximately 30 % and 36 %, respectively) in whole-body tissues of air-exposed fish, while levels of arginase remained unchanged. The activities of enzymes involved in amino acid and oxidative metabolism were not significantly different between control and air-exposed fish. Partitioning of the anterior and posterior ends of immersed fish revealed that just over half (57 %) of the total nitrogen (ammonia+urea) was excreted through the anterior end of the fish, presumably via the branchial tissues, while emersed fish increased excretion via the posterior end (kidney+skin). R. marmoratus do not undergo a shift towards ureotelism during air-exposure. Rather, we propose…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.205.1.91

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frick, N. T., & Wright, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Wright, P. A.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
205
Issue
1
Pages
91-100
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2403084742
Cited by
81
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
Rivulus marmoratus, mangrove killifish, nitrogen metabolism, ammonia volatilization, urea excretion, air exposure, urea cycle, ornithine transcarbamylase, free amino acids, teleosts
MeSH terms
Air, Amino Acids, Ammonia, Animals, Arginase, Gills, Glutamine, Nitrogen, Ornithine, Ornithine Carbamoyltransferase, Urea, Volatilization, Glutamic Acid, Carbon-Nitrogen Ligases, Fundulidae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review