Cited by 137Fish biology, ecology, and behaviorIchthyology and Marine BiologyTactile and Sensory Interactions

The Activity of Lateral-Line Efferent Neurones in Stationary and Swimming Dogfish

Roberts, B. L., Russell, I. J.·1972·Journal of Experimental Biology

Abstract

The activity of efferent neurones innervating lateral-line organs on the body of dogfish was followed by recording from filaments of cranial nerve X in 41 decerebrate preparations. The efferent nerves were not spontaneously active. Tactile stimulation to the head and body, vestibular stimulation and noxious chemical stimulation were followed by activity of the efferent nerves. In contrast, natural stimulation of lateral-line organs (water jets) did not reflexly evoke discharges from the efferent fibres. Reflex efferent responses were still obtained to mechanical stimulation even after the lateral-line organs had been denervated. Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves innervating lateral-lines organs was followed by reflex activity of the efferent fibres. But similar stimuli applied to other cranial nerves were equally effective in exciting the efferent system. Vigorous movements of the fish, involving the white musculature, were preceded and accompanied by activity of the efferent fibres which persisted as long as the white muscle fibres were contracting. Rhythmical swimming movements were accompanied by a few impulses in the efferent fibres grouped in bursts at the same frequency as the swimming movements. It is concluded that the efferent neurones cannot contribute to a feedback regulatory system because they are not excited by natural stimulation of the lateral-line sense organs. The close correlation found between efferent activity and body movement suggests that the efferent system might operate in a protective manner to prevent the sense organs from being over-stimulated when the fish makes vigorous movements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1242/jeb.57.2.435

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To avoid reafferent saturation, CDs of swimming commands directly inhibit the lateral-line hair cells in the dogfish.

    “To avoid reafferent saturation, CDs of swimming commands directly inhibit the lateral-line hair cells20.”

    From Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom (2008) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, B. L., & Russell, I. J.
Affiliations
Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (GB)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
1972-10-01
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
435-448
ISSN
  • 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9145
OpenAlex
W2097211153
Cited by
137
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
19.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
dogfish, lateral line organ, vagus nerve, swimming, body movement, vestibular stimulation, tactile stimulation
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Cranial Nerves, Electrophysiology, Locomotion, Neurons, Neurons, Efferent, Photic Stimulation, Physical Stimulation, Sharks, Stimulation, Chemical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review