The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental Analysis of Adhesion Of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) On A Variety of Surfaces
Abstract
Pulling forces of Chrysolina polita (L.) on glass, perspex and cloth have been recorded and are plotted against body weight. The additional weight of eggs in many of the females is probably the main reason that, in females, pulling forces do. not increase significantly with body weight, whereas those of males do. Pulling forces on glass and perspex are significantly correlated but, in general, neither are significantly correlated with those on cloth. This is because traction on glass and perspex is achieved by the adhesive setae, and on cloth by the tarsal claws. Counts of the adhesive setae in 14 individuals indicate that numbers of climbing setae in females and males and females (combined), male setae in males, and the total number of adhesive setae in males, all show a significant increase with body weight. Pulling force increases with the total number of adhesive setae in females, and males and females (combined). Multiple regression analysis confirms the view that pulling force is a function of the number of adhesive setae. Hooks, suction, electrostatic forces and seizure are largely discredited, and molecular adhesion between the setae and the substratum, and possibly the cohesive forces and surface tension of a thin fluid layer, are confirmed as the most likely modes of adhesion on smooth surfaces in C. polita and most beetles. It is proposed that the main forces of detachment acting on a leaf beetle are probably drag and the whiplash effect of the leaves and branches. Estimates for the wind speeds required to remove beetles from glass and cloth by drag forces alone are calculated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair
Autumn, K., Liang, Y. A., Hsieh, S. T., Zesch, W., Chan, W. P., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., & Full, R. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35015073 · Cited by 2,758
Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae
Autumn, K., Sitti, M., Liang, Y. A., Peattie, A. M., Hansen, W. R., Sponberg, S., Kenny, T. W., Fearing, R., Israelachvili, J. N., & Full, R. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.192252799 · Cited by 1,949
Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures
Gao, H., & Yao, H. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0400757101 · Cited by 458
Drechsler, P., & Federle, W. (2006) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-006-0150-5 · Cited by 214
Structural Design and Biomechanics of Friction-Based Releasable Attachment Devices in Insects
Gorb, S. N. (2002) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/42.6.1127 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Stork, N. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Biology
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 1980-10-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-108
- ISSN
- 0022-0949 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9145
- OpenAlex
- W2135691373
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental Analysis of Adhesion Of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) On A Variety of Surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1242/jeb.88.1.91
- The paper
- Stork, N. E. (1980). Experimental Analysis of Adhesion Of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) On A Variety of Surfaces. Journal of Experimental Biology. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.88.1.91
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.