The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: A review
Abstract
The superior scattering properties of gas bubbles compared with blood cells have made microbubble ultrasound contrast agents important tools in ultrasound diagnosis. Over the past 2 years they have become the focus of a wide and rapidly expanding field of research, with their benefits being repeatedly demonstrated, both in ultrasound image enhancement, and more recently in drug and gene delivery applications. However, despite considerable investigation, their behaviour is by no means fully understood and, while no definite evidence of harmful effects has been obtained, there remain some concerns as to their safety. In this review the existing theoretical and experimental evidence is examined in order to clarify the extent to which contrast agents are currently understood and to identify areas for future research. In particular the disparity between the conditions considered in theoretical models and those encountered both in vitro, and more importantly in vivo is discussed, together with the controversy regarding the risk of harmful bio-effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sonoporation from Jetting Cavitation Bubbles
Ohl, C.-D., Arora, M., Ikink, R., de Jong, N., Versluis, M., Delius, M., & Lohse, D. (2006) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.075366 · Cited by 498
Engineered nanoparticles for biomolecular imaging
Mahmoudi, M., Serpooshan, V., & Laurent, S. (2011) · Nanoscale · doi:10.1039/c1nr10326a · Cited by 262
Novel microbubble preparation technologies
Stride, E., & Edirisinghe, M. (2008) · Soft Matter · doi:10.1039/b809517p · Cited by 262
Self-citationTargeted Nanotheranostics for Future Personalized Medicine: Recent Progress in Cancer Therapy
Jo, S. D., Ku, S. H., Won, Y.-Y., Kim, S. H., & Kwon, I. C. (2016) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.15335 · Cited by 218
Recent advances in nanomaterial-based augmented sonodynamic therapy of cancer
Um, W., E. K., P. K., Lee, J., Kim, C. H., You, D. G., & Park, J. H. (2021) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d0cc07750j · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Stride, E., & Saffari, N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 217
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 429-447
- ISSN
- 0954-4119 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-3033
- OpenAlex
- W2142283084
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1243/09544110360729072
- The paper
- Stride, E., & Saffari, N. (2003). Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544110360729072
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.