Cited by 36Plant tissue culture and regenerationGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Analysis of genetic stability through intersimple sequence repeats molecular markers in micropropagated plantlets of Anoectochilus formosanus Hayata, a medicinal plant

Open access
Zhang, Fusheng, Lv, Yali, Dong, Hailing, Guo, Shunxing·2010·Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin

Abstract

Anoectochilus formosanus HAYATA, commonly known as "Jewel Orchids," which has been used as Chinese folk medicines, is being subjected to a huge crisis, whose wild resources have gradually become more and more scarce. Hence, micropropagation protocol by axillary branching established for A. formosanus was employed for large-scale commercial production. In this study, due to the somaclonal variation and on the basis of some virtue of intersimple sequence repeats (ISSR) analysis, we firstly utilized the ISSR primers to investigate the genetic stability of A. formosanus propagated in vitro for a period of more than 5 years. Among the total 100 bands amplified by 17 ISSR markers, 77 bands were distributed in size from 500 bp to 1.5 kbp, while only 5 bands were beyond 1.8 kbp in size. Meanwhile, according to the cluster analysis, genetic similarity was more than 94% and the polymorphism rate was only 2.76% among the total 1810 scorable bands. All results demonstrate A. formosanus, multiplied by axillary branching, maintained high genetic fidelity even after a period of more than 5 years under in vitro propagation with only a low risk of genetic instability. The results from this study provide an important basis for giving evidence of genetic stability of A. formosanus before micropropagation for large-scale commercial production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1248/bpb.33.384

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ISSR markers, applied comparatively between plantlets and mother plant, generally revealed the clonal nature of analyzed regenerants, highlighting genetic fidelity of in vitro propagation, even after several years.

    “However, the ISSR markers, applied comparatively between the plantlets and the mother plant revealed, in general, the clonal nature of the analyzed regenerants, highlighting the genetic fidelity of in vitro propagation, even after several years [70,71,72].”

    From Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants (2023) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Discussion (page not provided) concludes that ISSR results showed high genetic fidelity in A. formosanus after more than five years of in vitro propagation. But Materials and Methods (page not provided) identifies the controls as two-year micropropagated plantlets from the same mother seedling, not the mother plant itself; the claimed direct comparison with the mother plant is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Editorial Committee of Flora of China & Chinese Academy of Sci- ences, "Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae," Science Press, Beijing, 2000.
  2. Institute of Research on Traditional Chinese Medicine of Fujian Province, "Record of Fujian Materia Medica," Fujian Science and Technology Press, Fuzhou, 1982.
  3. Editorial Committee of China's State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, "Chung-Hua-Ben-Tsao," Shanghai Science Tech- nology Press, Shanghai, 1999, pp. 672-673.
  4. Chiu N. Y., Chang K. H., "Illustrated Medicinal Plants of Taiwan," SMC Publishing Inc., Taipei, 1995, pp. 282-283.
  5. Phillips R. L., Kaeppler S. M., Olhoft P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 91, 5222-5226 (1994).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, F., Lv, Y., Dong, H., & Guo, S.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College
Venue
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Published
2010
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
384-388
ISSN
  • 0918-6158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-5215
OpenAlex
W2056961063
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National High-tech Research and Development Program
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
Anoectochilus formosanus, genetic stability, somaclonal variation, ISSR markers, micropropagation, axillary branching, genetic fidelity, medicinal plants, genetic polymorphism
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Plants, Medicinal, Polymorphism, Genetic, Cluster Analysis, Plant Shoots, DNA, Plant, Genome, Plant, Tandem Repeat Sequences, Orchidaceae, Genomic Instability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review