Cited by 208Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studiesInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

Studies on the drugs for peptic ulcer. A reliable method for producing stress ulcer in rats

Open access
Takagi, Keijiro, Kasuya, Yutaka, Watanabe, Kazuo·1964·Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin

Abstract

A simple and reliable method for production of gastric ulcer on rats by stress was described. Rats fixed on boards were immersed in water of 25°to the depth of xiphoide. After 20 hours, marked gastric erosions were found in the glandular portion of the stomach. This stress is more favourable than other stresses as cold, restraint, or emotional stress by stress box in view of incidence and mortality. Anticholinergics or central depressants effectively inhibited the ulceration and combination of both drugs suppressed it more effectively than single administration of each drug.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1248/cpb.12.465

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The models of esophagitis used combined two elements known to contribute to esophageal injury: hyperglycemia and exposure to restraint-stress.

    “The models of esophagitis used combined two elements known to contribute to esophageal injury: hyperglycemia [36] and exposure to restraint-stress [13], [37].”

    From Cytoprotective Effects of Hydrogen Sulfide in Novel Rat Models of Non-Erosive Esophagitis (2014) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Comparison of Various Stressors (pp. 4–5) describes restraint stress in rats and reports gastric ulcers in the restraint group. The paper does not establish that restraint stress contributes to esophageal injury; its observed lesions were in the stomach (The Incidence of Stress Ulcer, p. 2). The hyperglycemia clause is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takagi, K., Kasuya, Y., & Watanabe, K.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Published
1964
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
465-472
ISSN
  • 0009-2363 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-5223
OpenAlex
W1573533055
Cited by
208
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Keywords
peptic ulcer, stress-induced gastric ulcer, gastric erosions, rat model, anticholinergic agents, central nervous system depressants, combination therapy, ulcer prevention
MeSH terms
Atropine, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Parasympatholytics, Peptic Ulcer, Pharmacology, Research, Stomach Ulcer, Stress, Physiological, Tranquilizing Agents, Ulcer, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review