Cited by 383Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsPhysical Activity and HealthPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Exercise and self-esteem: rationale and model

SONSTROEM, ROBERT J., MORGAN, WILLIAM P.·1989·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

SONSTROEM, R. J. and W. P. MORGAN. Exercise and self-esteem: rationale and model. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 329–337, 1989. Positive emotional and psychological benefits are commonly believed to result from chronic physical exercise. While reviews of research have failed to substantiate this general proposition, they have identified enhanced self-esteem as an empirically supported exercise outcome. Unfortunately, research in this area has tended to be simplistic in self-esteem theory and measurement and has remained incapable of addressing how or why change may occur. This paper summarizes pertinent self-esteem theory and presents an empirically based rationale for self-esteem enhancement through exercise participation. It constructs a model for examining exercise and self-esteem interactions in which components of self-structure are hierarchically organized on a basis of generality. The self-esteem model contains dimensions of competence and self-acceptance, and it is operationally defined.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/00005768-198906000-00018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to theory, improvements in specific physical self-perceptions (e.g., perceived sport competence) generalize to improvements in overall physical self-concept and ultimately to enhanced self-esteem.

    “As previously described, improvements in specific physical self-perceptions (e.g., perceived sport competence) are hypothesized to generalize to improvements in overall physical self-concept and ultimately to enhanced self-esteem.”
  • According to theory, improvements in self-esteem should be expected in the presence of positive changes in self-perceptions or self-concept.

    “According to the theory, improvements in self-esteem should be expected in the presence of positive changes in self-perceptions or self-concept.”
  • These findings are consistent with the predictions of the Exercise and Self-Esteem Model and Shavelson's model of self-concept.

    “These findings are consistent with the predictions of the Exercise and Self-Esteem Model 30 and Shavelston's model of self-concept. 31”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
SONSTROEM, R. J., & MORGAN, W. P.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1989-06
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
329???337
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294570529
Cited by
383
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
physical activity, self-esteem, self-esteem theory, self-structure, competence, self-acceptance, self-esteem measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review