The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The energy cost of walking before and after significant weight loss
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether significant weight loss reduced the energy cost of activity more than that expected based on decreased body weight. Standing energy expenditure was measured and subtracted from the total energy cost of walking to determine ambulatory energy expenditure (AEE). The energy cost of walking was determined in 11 obese women at baseline, week 9 [after 8 wk of a 1758-3349 kJ.d-1 diet], and week 22 (after 2 wk of weight stability). AEE accounted for 80% of the energy cost of walking. Body weight was the principal determinant of AEE, but the relationship was not 1:1. Subjects reduced body weight by 13% at week 9 and 21% at week 22. Analyses which controlled for the relationship between AEE and weight at baseline, showed no change in AEE at week 9. By contrast, at week 22, AEE was reduced more than expected based on a lower body weight. These findings suggest that after significant weight loss, reduced-obese persons will expend less energy for the same activity, even after accounting for the decrease in body weight. These data also suggest that weight-based estimates of exercise energy expenditure may be inappropriate after significant weight loss.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Foster et al. reported a 25%-38% reduction in the energetic cost of walking in subjects who lost 21% of their body weight (20.9 kg).
“For example, Foster et al. [177] reported a 25%–38% reduction in the energetic cost of walking in subjects who lost 21% of their body weight (20.9 kg).”
From International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: diets for body weight reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [177]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saris, W. H. M., Blair, S. N., Van Baak, M. A., Eaton, S. B., Davies, P. S. W., Di Pietro, L., Fogelholm, M., Rissanen, A., Schoeller, D., Swinburn, B., et al. (2003) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1046/j.1467-789x.2003.00101.x · Cited by 865
Effects of experimental weight perturbation on skeletal muscle work efficiency in human subjects
Rosenbaum, M., Vandenborne, K., Goldsmith, R., Simoneau, J.-A., Heymsfield, S., Joanisse, D. R., Hirsch, J., Murphy, E., Matthews, D., Segal, K. R., et al. (2003) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00474.2002 · Cited by 255
Bariatric Surgery: Consequences on Functional Capacities in Patients With Obesity
Reinmann, A., Gafner, S. C., Hilfiker, R., Bruyneel, A.-V., Pataky, Z., & Allet, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.646283 · Cited by 26
“Indeed, a massive weight loss would help people to move better or perform PA (17) as the reduction of friction between the thighs or between the arms and the trunk associated with a reduction in extraneous movement (legs and arms swinging closer) would reduce the energy cost of walking (33).”
BackgroundLarsson, U. E., & Mattsson, E. (2003) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1080/16501970306114 · Cited by 20
International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: diets for body weight reduction
Aragon, A. A., Campbell, B. I., Schoenfeld, B. J., Stout, J. R., Kalman, D., Arciero, P. J., Arent, S. M., Kreider, R. B., Taylor, L. W., Bannock, L., et al. (2026) · Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · doi:10.1080/15502783.2026.2740266
Metadata
- Authors
- FOSTER, G. D., WADDEN, T. A., KENDRICK, Z. V., LETIZIA, K. A., LANDER, D. P., & CONILL, A. M.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 888???894
- ISSN
- 0195-9131
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review