Developing the P (for Progression) in a FITT-VP Exercise Prescription
Abstract
Q: For an exercise prescription to be effective, advancement or progression is recommended. What factors should be considered when addressing progression of an exercise program? A: Progression is an important part of an effective exercise program. To highlight the various aspects to consider when developing an exercise training plan, the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) uses the FITT-VP principle of exercise prescription (1,2). The FITT-VP principle includes the following: Frequency (how often is exercise done each week), Intensity (how hard is the exercise), Time (how long is the exercise duration), Type (what is the mode of exercise), Volume (what is the total amount of exercise), and Progression (how is the program advanced).FITT-VP is applied to each component of a complete exercise program, including aerobic, resistance, flexibility, and neuromotor exercise training. Within this frame of reference, an exercise prescription should be individualized with consideration for health status (including clinical conditions), physical ability, age, training responses, and individual goals (1). For example, a training program for a 25-year-old competitive marathoner obviously will differ from a 65-year-old patient participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program. Even in an apparent homogeneous group, progression should be individualized to match personal goals as well as differing responses to the exercise stimulus. Thus, ACSM recommendations are presented in a way that supports customization to match the individual participant with ranges and options for frequency, intensity, time, and type of activity. See Box 1 for a brief summary of recommendations for adults (for more complete information on the FITT-VP for each exercise component, see the ACSM Position Stand at http://journals.lww.com/acsm-msse/Abstract/2011/07000/Quantity_and_Quality_of_Exercise_for_Developing.26.aspx (2)). BOX 1. Exercise recommendations for adults Recommendations for the components of a complete exercise program include the following (note – deconditioned or sedentary individuals may benefit from activity levels below those listed; additional recommendations are available for youth as well as older adults (1)): AEROBIC EXECISE: At least 5 days/week of moderate intensity activity or at least 3 days/week of vigorous activity, or a combination of moderate and vigorous on at least 3 to 5 days/week; 30 to 60 minutes/day for moderate activity and 20 to 60 minutes/day for vigorous activity; includes exercises using major muscle groups in a continuous, rhythmic manner. RESISTANCE EXERCISE: Train each major muscle group 2 to 3 days per week; for strength development 60% to 70% of one repetition max (1-RM) for novice to intermediate exercisers and higher levels (80% or greater) for more experienced strength exercisers, for muscular endurance development 50% 1-RM or lower; includes exercises for each major muscle group. FLEXIBILITY EXERCISE: At least 2 to 3 days/week (daily is most effective); stretch to point of feeling tightness or slight discomfort; includes exercises (static, dynamic, ballistic, or proprioception neuromuscular facilitation) for each of the major muscle-tendon units. NEUROMOTOR EXERCISE: At least 2 to 3 days/week; consider at least 20 to 30 minutes; activities depend on the individual with recommendations for fall reduction including exercises involving balance, agility, coordination, gait, proprioception, and other multifaceted activities such as Tai Chi and yoga. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROGRESSION Progression takes into account the exercise volume (which reflects FITT factors) over time. General progression recommendations by ACSM for each of these areas are described in Box 2 (1). Given the current lack of research on optimal progression for flexibility and neuromotor exercise training, the focus of this article is on aerobic and resistance exercise for general health and fitness. Box 2. Exercise prescription progression ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 10th edition, includes information on the principle of progression as follows: AEROBIC EXERCISE: Program advancement can occur by adjusting frequency, intensity, and/or time, thus progressing the overall exercise volume. Care should be taken to enhance adherence also while reducing risks of injury or cardiac events; the recommendation of “start low and go slow” reflects this objective. RESISTANCE EXERCISE: Program advancement can occur by adjusting resistance, repetitions, and/or frequency. FLEXIBLITY EXERCISE: Methods to achieve optimal progression are not known. NEUROMOTOR EXERCISE: Methods to achieve optimal progression are not known. The ACSM Position Stand “Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory, Musculoskeletal, and Neuromotor Fitness in Apparently Healthy Adults: Guidance for Prescribing Exercise” includes evidence-based recommendations related to exercise prescription (for information on the ev
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Garber, C. E., Blissmer, B., Deschenes, M. R., Franklin, B. A., Lamonte, M. J., Lee, I.-M., Nieman, D. C., & Swain, D. P. (2011) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e318213fefb · Cited by 9,319 · see citing works
Finding the Balance Between Overload and Recovery
Bushman, B. A. (2016) · ACSMʼs Health & Fitness Journal · doi:10.1249/fit.0000000000000168 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What we already know about the effects of exercise in patients with fibromyalgia: An umbrella review
Andrade, A., Dominski, F. H., & Sieczkowska, S. M. (2020) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.02.003 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Paquin, J., Tremblay, R., Islam, H., Riesco, E., Marcotte-Chénard, A., & Dionne, I. J. (2024) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2024-0128 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Dobbie, L. J., Tolvanen, L., Alves, D., Baker, J. L., Bez, N. S., Birney, S., Bogl, L. H., Brown, A., Bullo, M., Clare, K., et al. (2026) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(26)00122-1 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bushman, B. A.
- Affiliations
- American College of Sports Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bushman, Barbara A.
- Venue
- ACSM'S Health & Fitness Journal
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 6-9
- ISSN
- 1091-5397 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801731399
- Semantic Scholar
- a1f21c9178d104f3e097ad82831dfa5d80e740ed
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACSMʼs Health & Fitness Journal (publishedVersion)
- BearWorks (Missouri State University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- exercise prescription, exercise progression, individualized training plans, exercise frequency, exercise intensity, exercise duration, exercise type, exercise volume, aerobic exercise, resistance training, flexibility training, sedentary adults, cardiac rehabilitation, older adults, training response variability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review