Cited by 90Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesKnee injuries and reconstruction techniquesHip disorders and treatments

Femur rotation increases patella cartilage stress in females with patellofemoral pain

LIAO, TZU-CHIEH, YANG, NICHOLAS, HO, KAI-YU, FARROKHI, SHAWN, POWERS, CHRISTOPHER M.·2015·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that internal rotation of the femur increases patellofemoral joint stress in persons with patellofemoral pain (PFP). METHODS: Patella cartilage stress profiles of nine female participants with PFP were obtained during squatting using subject-specific finite element (FE) models of the patellofemoral joint (15° and 45° of knee flexion). Input parameters for the FE model included joint geometry, quadriceps muscle forces during squatting, and weight-bearing patellofemoral joint kinematics. The femur of each model was then internally rotated 5° and 10° along its long axis beyond that of the natural degree of rotation. Using a nonlinear FE solver, quasistatic loading simulations were performed to quantify patellofemoral joint stress. RESULTS: Compared with those at the natural position of the femur, mean hydrostatic pressure and mean octahedral shear stress were significantly higher when the femur was internally rotated 5° and 10°. No significant differences in stress variables were observed when the femur was rotated from 5° to 10°. These findings were consistent across both knee flexion angles (15° and 45°). CONCLUSIONS: The finding of elevated hydrostatic pressure and octahedral shear stress with internal rotation of the femur supports the premise that females with PFP who exhibit abnormal hip kinematics may be exposed to elevated patellofemoral joint stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000000617

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LIAO, T.-C., YANG, N., HO, K.-Y., FARROKHI, S., & POWERS, C. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2015-09
Volume
47
Issue
9
Pages
1775-1780
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969179264
Cited by
90
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
Keywords
patellofemoral pain, femoral internal rotation, patellofemoral joint stress, patellar cartilage, hydrostatic pressure, octahedral shear stress, squatting, female athletes, hip kinematics, subject-specific finite element models, knee flexion angle
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cartilage, Articular, Female, Femur, Humans, Rotation, Stress, Mechanical, Arthralgia, Quadriceps Muscle, Patellofemoral Joint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review