The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wear Compliance and Activity in Children Wearing Wrist- and Hip-Mounted Accelerometers
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to 1) explore children's compliance to wearing wrist- and hip-mounted accelerometers, 2) compare children's physical activity (PA) derived from raw accelerations of wrist and hip, and 3) examine differences in raw and counts PA measured by hip-worn accelerometry. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine 9- to 10-yr-old children wore a wrist-mounted GENEActiv accelerometer (GAwrist) and a hip-mounted ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer (AGhip) for 7 d. Both devices measured raw accelerations, and the AGhip also provided count-based data. RESULTS: More children wore the GAwrist than those from the AGhip regardless of wear time criteria applied (P < 0.001-0.035). Raw data signal vector magnitude (r = 0.68), moderate PA (MPA) (r = 0.81), vigorous PA (VPA) (r = 0.85), and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (r = 0.83) were strongly associated between devices (P < 0.001). GAwrist signal vector magnitude (P = 0.001), MPA (P = 0.037), VPA (P = 0.002), and MVPA (P = 0.016) were significantly greater than those from the AGhip. According to GAwrist raw data, 86.9% of children engaged in at least 60 min · d(-1) of MVPA, compared with 19% for AGhip. ActiGraph MPA (raw) was 42.00 ± 1.61 min · d(-1) compared with 35.05 ± 0.99 min · d(-1) (counts) (P = 0.02). ActiGraph VPA was 7.59 ± 0.46 min · d(-1) (raw) and 37.06 ± 1.85 min · d(-1) (counts; P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: In children, accelerometer wrist placement promotes superior compliance than the hip. Raw accelerations were significantly higher for GAwrist compared with those for AGhip possibly because of placement location and technical differences between devices. AGhip PA calculated from raw accelerations and counts differed substantially, demonstrating that PA outcomes derived from cut points for raw output and counts cannot be directly compared.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children
Evenson, K. R., Catellier, D. J., Gill, K., Ondrak, K. S., & McMurray, R. G. (2008) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410802334196 · Cited by 2,677
The Technology of Accelerometry-Based Activity Monitors: Current and Future
CHEN, K. Y., & BASSETT, D. R. (2005) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82 · Cited by 996
Best Practices for Using Physical Activity Monitors in Population-Based Research
MATTHEWS, C. E., HAGSTRÖMER, M., POBER, D. M., & BOWLES, H. R. (2012) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3182399e5b · Cited by 703
Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer
ESLIGER, D. W., ROWLANDS, A. V., HURST, T. L., CATT, M., MURRAY, P., & ESTON, R. G. (2011) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31820513be · Cited by 625
Self-citationProtocols for evaluating equivalency of accelerometry-based activity monitors
WELK, G. J., MCCLAIN, J., & AINSWORTH, B. E. (2012) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3182399d8f · Cited by 124
Cited by
Barnett, T. A., Kelly, A. S., Young, D. R., Perry, C. K., Pratt, C. A., Edwards, N. M., Rao, G., Vos, M. B., & On behalf of the American Heart Association Obesity Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and Stroke Council (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000591 · Cited by 249
Accelerometer-assessed Physical Activity in Epidemiology: Are Monitors Equivalent?
ROWLANDS, A. V., MIRKES, E. M., YATES, T., CLEMES, S., DAVIES, M., KHUNTI, K., & EDWARDSON, C. L. (2018) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001435 · Cited by 187
Self-citationComparability and feasibility of wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers in free-living adolescents.
Scott, J. J., Rowlands, A. V., Cliff, D. P., Morgan, P. J., Plotnikoff, R. C., & Lubans, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.04.017 · Cited by 120
Self-citationDobell, A., Pringle, A., Faghy, M. A., & Roscoe, C. M. P. (2020) · Children · doi:10.3390/children7110224 · Cited by 57
Taylor, S. L., Noonan, R. J., Knowles, Z. R., Owen, M. B., McGrane, B., Curry, W. B., & Fairclough, S. J. (2018) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph15051011 · Cited by 47
Self-citationShelley, J., Fairclough, S. J., Knowles, Z. R., Southern, K. W., McCormack, P., Dawson, E. A., Graves, L. E. F., & Hanlon, C. (2018) · BMC Pediatrics · doi:10.1186/s12887-018-1301-x · Cited by 31
Self-citationSurveillance of Youth Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Wrist Accelerometry
Kim, Y., Hibbing, P., Saint-Maurice, P. F., Ellingson, L. D., Hennessy, E., Wolff-Hughes, D. L., Perna, F. M., & Welk, G. J. (2017) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.012 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- FAIRCLOUGH, S. J., NOONAN, R., ROWLANDS, A. V., VAN HEES, V., KNOWLES, Z., & BODDY, L. M.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-253
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2276660292
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
