The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relevance of Sex Differences in Performance Fatigability
Open accessAbstract
Performance fatigability differs between men and women for a range of fatiguing tasks. Women are usually less fatigable than men, and this is most widely described for isometric fatiguing contractions and some dynamic tasks. The sex difference in fatigability is specific to the task demands so that one mechanism is not universal, including any sex differences in skeletal muscle physiology, muscle perfusion, and voluntary activation. However, there are substantial knowledge gaps about the task dependency of the sex differences in fatigability, the involved mechanisms, and the relevance to clinical populations and with advanced age. The knowledge gaps are in part due to the significant deficits in the number of women included in performance fatigability studies despite a gradual increase in the inclusion of women for the last 20 yr. Therefore, this review 1) provides a rationale for the limited knowledge about sex differences in performance fatigability, 2) summarizes the current knowledge on sex differences in fatigability and the potential mechanisms across a range of tasks, 3) highlights emerging areas of opportunity in clinical populations, and 4) suggests strategies to close the knowledge gap and understanding the relevance of sex differences in performance fatigability. The limited understanding about sex differences in fatigability in healthy and clinical populations presents as a field ripe with opportunity for high-impact studies. Such studies will inform on the limitations of men and women during athletic endeavors, ergonomic tasks, and daily activities. Because fatigability is required for effective neuromuscular adaptation, sex differences in fatigability studies will also inform on optimal strategies for training and rehabilitation in both men and women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Skeletal muscles of males compared to females are generally stronger and more powerful, but muscles of males might be more easily fatigable.”
From Nutrition for Older Athletes: Focus on Sex-Differences (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exercise training and nutritional supplementation for physical frailty in very elderly people
Fiatarone, M. A., O'Neill, E. F., Ryan, N. D., Clements, K. M., Solares, G. R., Nelson, M. E., Roberts, S. B., Kehayias, J. J., Lipsitz, L. A., & Evans, W. J. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199406233302501 · Cited by 2,857
Translating Fatigue to Human Performance
ENOKA, R. M., & DUCHATEAU, J. (2016) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000000929 · Cited by 948
Female mice liberated for inclusion in neuroscience and biomedical research
Prendergast, B. J., Onishi, K. G., & Zucker, I. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.001 · Cited by 788
Fiber Type Composition of the Vastus Lateralis Muscle of Young Men and Women
Staron, R. S., Hagerman, F. C., Hikida, R. S., Murray, T. F., Hostler, D. P., Crill, M. T., Ragg, K. E., & Toma, K. (2000) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1177/002215540004800506 · Cited by 730
Racine, M., Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., Kloda, L. A., Dion, D., Dupuis, G., & Choinière, M. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.025 · Cited by 691
Sex differences in human fatigability: mechanisms and insight to physiological responses
Hunter, S. K. (2014) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.12234 · Cited by 595
Self-citationHuman variation in skeletal muscle fiber-type proportion and enzyme activities
Simoneau, J. A., & Bouchard, C. (1989) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1989.257.4.e567 · Cited by 484
Female rats are not more variable than male rats: a meta-analysis of neuroscience studies
Becker, J. B., Prendergast, B. J., & Liang, J. W. (2016) · Biology of Sex Differences · doi:10.1186/s13293-016-0087-5 · Cited by 473
Sex differences in exercise metabolism and the role of 17-beta estradiol.
TARNOPOLSKY, M. A. (2008) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31816212ff · Cited by 354
Metabolic response in type I and type II muscle fibers during a 30-s cycle sprint in men and women
Esbjörnsson-Liljedahl, M., Sundberg, C. J., Norman, B., & Jansson, E. (1999) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1999.87.4.1326 · Cited by 199
Cited by
“Invisible sportswomen”: The sex data gap in sport and exercise science research
Cowley, E. S., Olenick, A. A., McNulty, K. L., & Ross, E. Z. (2021) · Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal · doi:10.1123/wspaj.2021-0028 · Cited by 449
Ansdell, P., Thomas, K., Hicks, K. M., Hunter, S. K., Howatson, G., & Goodall, S. (2020) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/ep088548 · Cited by 403
Self-citationSex differences in resistance training: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Roberts, B. M., Nuckols, G., & Krieger, J. W. (2020) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000003521 · Cited by 240
HUNTER, S. K., S. ANGADI, S., BHARGAVA, A., HARPER, J., HIRSCHBERG, A. L., D. LEVINE, B., L. MOREAU, K., J. NOKOFF, N., STACHENFELD, N. S., & BERMON, S. (2023) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000003300 · Cited by 241
Self-citationSex Differences in Endurance Running.
Besson, T., Macchi, R., Rossi, J., Morio, C. Y. M., Kunimasa, Y., Nicol, C., Vercruyssen, F., & Millet, G. Y. (2022) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01651-w · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- HUNTER, S. K.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2247-2256
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2326676506
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 8.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relevance of Sex Differences in Performance Fatigability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/mss.0000000000000928
- The paper
- HUNTER, S. K. (2016). The Relevance of Sex Differences in Performance Fatigability. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000928
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
