Cited by 449Sex and Gender in HealthcareSports, Gender, and SocietyDiversity and Career in Medicine

“Invisible sportswomen”: The sex data gap in sport and exercise science research

Cowley, Emma S., Olenick, Alyssa A., McNulty, Kelly L., Ross, Emma Z.·2021·Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal

Abstract

This study aimed to conduct an updated exploration of the ratio of male and female participants in sport and exercise science research. Publications involving humans were examined from The European Journal of Sports Science, Medicine & Science in Sport & Exercise, The Journal of Sport Science & Medicine, The Journal of Physiology, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, and The British Journal of Sports Medicine , 2014–2020. The total number of participants, the number of male and female participants, the title, and the topic, were recorded for each publication. Data were expressed in frequencies and percentages. Chi-square analyses were used to assess the differences in frequencies in each of the journals. About 5,261 publications and 12,511,386 participants were included in the analyses. Sixty-three percentage of publications included both males and females, 31% included males only, and 6% included females only ( p < .0001). When analyzing participants included in all journals, a total of 8,253,236 (66%) were male and 4,254,445 (34%) were female ( p < .0001). Females remain significantly underrepresented within sport and exercise science research. Therefore, at present most conclusions made from sport and exercise science research might only be applicable to one sex. As such, researchers and practitioners should be aware of the ongoing sex data gap within the current literature, and future research should address this.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1123/wspaj.2021-0028

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cowley, E. S., Olenick, A. A., McNulty, K. L., & Ross, E. Z.
Affiliations
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Northumbria University (GB)
  • The Well HQ, BBE Health Ltd, London, United Kingdom
Venue
Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
146-151
ISSN
  • 1063-6161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-1581
OpenAlex
W3200760521
Cited by
449
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 113 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 4
FWCI
50.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
sex differences in research, underrepresentation of women, sex bias in research, sex-inclusive research, women in sport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review