Cited by 691Sex and Gender in HealthcarePain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Placebo Effect

A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception – Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men?

Racine, Mélanie, Tousignant-Laflamme, Yannick, Kloda, Lorie A., Dion, Dominique, Dupuis, Gilles, Choinière, Manon·2012·Pain

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise the results of 10 years of human laboratory research on pain and sex/gender. An electronic search strategy was designed by a medical librarian and conducted in multiple databases. A total of 172 articles published between 1998 and 2008 were retrieved, analyzed, and synthesized. The first set of results (122 articles), which is presented in this paper, examined sex difference in the perception of laboratory-induced thermal, pressure, ischemic, muscle, electrical, chemical, and visceral pain in healthy subjects. This review suggests that females (F) and males (M) have comparable thresholds for cold and ischemic pain, while pressure pain thresholds are lower in F than M. There is strong evidence that F tolerate less thermal (heat, cold) and pressure pain than M but it is not the case for tolerance to ischemic pain, which is comparable in both sexes. The majority of the studies that measured pain intensity and unpleasantness showed no sex difference in many pain modalities. In summary, 10 years of laboratory research have not been successful in producing a clear and consistent pattern of sex differences in human pain sensitivity, even with the use of deep, tonic, long-lasting stimuli, which are known to better mimic clinical pain. Whether laboratory studies in healthy subjects are the best paradigm to investigate sex differences in pain perception is open to question and should be discussed with a view to enhancing the clinical relevance of these experiments and developing new research avenues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.025

Cites

185 of 185 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Basic research has not been successfully linked to meaningful differences that can influence the design of pain rehabilitation packages.

    “but other than that, basic research has not been successfully linked to meaningful differences that can influence the design of pain rehabilitation packages [25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 187 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Racine, M., Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., Kloda, L. A., Dion, D., Dupuis, G., & Choinière, M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Choinière, Manon
Venue
Pain
Published
2012-03
Volume
153
Issue
3
Pages
602-618
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040248009
Cited by
691
References
187
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 20
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
sex differences, gender differences, pain perception, experimental pain, pain tolerance, pain threshold, thermal pain, pressure pain, ischemic pain, visceral pain, electrical pain, chemical pain, myalgia, pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, sex differences in pain sensitivity
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Hyperalgesia, Ischemia, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Sex Characteristics, Databases, Bibliographic, Pain Threshold, Biomedical Research, Pain Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review