Cited by 80Exercise and Physiological ResponsesMuscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and Training

Six days of low carbohydrate, not energy availability, alters the iron and immune response to exercise in elite athletes

MCKAY, ALANNAH K. A., PEELING, PETER, PYNE, DAVID B., TEE, NICOLIN, WHITFIELD, JAMIE, SHARMA, AVISH P., HEIKURA, IDA A., BURKE, LOUISE M.·2022·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

Purpose To quantify the effects of a short-term (6-d) low carbohydrate (CHO) high fat (LCHF), and low energy availability (LEA) diet on immune, inflammatory, and iron-regulatory responses to exercise in endurance athletes. Methods Twenty-eight elite male race walkers completed two 6-d diet/training phases. During phase 1 (Baseline), all athletes consumed a high CHO/energy availability (CON) diet (65% CHO and ~40 kcal·kg-1 fat-free mass (FFM)·d-1). In phase 2 (Adaptation), athletes were allocated to either a CON (n = 10), LCHF (n = 8; Results The LCHF athletes displayed a greater IL-6 (P = 0.019) and hepcidin (P = 0.011) response to exercise after Adaptation, compared with Baseline. Similarly, postexercise increases in total white blood cell counts (P = 0.026) and cortisol levels (P 0.05). No differences between CON and LEA were evident for any of the measured biological markers (all P > 0.05). Conclusions Short-term adherence to a LCHF diet elicited small yet unfavorable iron, immune, and stress responses to exercise. In contrast, no substantial alterations to athlete health were observed when athletes restricted energy availability compared with athletes with adequate energy availability. Therefore, short-term restriction of CHO, rather than energy, may have greater negative impacts on athlete health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000002819

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MCKAY, A. K. A., PEELING, P., PYNE, D. B., TEE, N., WHITFIELD, J., SHARMA, A. P., HEIKURA, I. A., & BURKE, L. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Ridley College (AU)
  • Canadian Sport Centre Pacific (CA)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2021-10-25
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
377-387
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W3208621791
Cited by
80
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
low-carbohydrate high-fat diet, energy availability, iron metabolism, hepcidin, interleukin-6, cortisol, inflammation, endurance athletes, race walking, blood glucose, dietary fat restriction, sports nutrition, elite athletes, white blood cell count, exercise stress response
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Immunity, Iron, Male, Biomarkers, Walking, Athletic Performance, Diet, Ketogenic, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review