Cited by 20Exercise and Physiological ResponsesSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The impact of chronic carbohydrate manipulation on mucosal immunity in elite endurance athletes

McKay, Alannah K. A., Pyne, David B., Peeling, Peter, Sharma, Avish P., Ross, Megan L.R., Burke, Louise M.·2019·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Carbohydrate (CHO) availability could alter mucosal immune responses to exercise. This study compared the effect of three dietary approaches to CHO availability on resting and post-exercise s-IgA levels. Elite race walkers (n = 26) adhered to a high CHO diet (HCHO), periodised CHO availability (PCHO) or a low CHO/high fat diet (LCHF) for 3 weeks while completing an intensified training program. HCHO and PCHO groups consumed 8.0–8.5 g.kg−1 CHO daily, with timing of ingestion manipulated to alter CHO availability around key training sessions. The LCHF diet comprised 80% fat and restricted CHO to < 50 g.day−1. A race walk test protocol (19 km females, 25 km males) was completed at baseline, after adaptation, and following CHO restoration. On each occasion, saliva samples were obtained pre- and post-exercise to quantify s-IgA levels. Resting s-IgA secretion rate substantially increased ~ two-fold post-intervention in all groups (HCHO: 2.2 ± 2.2, PCHO: 2.8 ± 3.2, LCHF: 1.6 ± 1.6; fold-change± 95% confidence limits), however, no substantial differences between dietary treatments were evident. Post-exercise, substantial 20–130% increases in s-IgA concentration and 43–64% reductions in flow rate occurred in all dietary treatments, with trivial differences evident between groups. It appears that high volume training overrides any effect of manipulating CHO availability on mucosal immunity in elite athletes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2018.1521712

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKay, A. K. A., Pyne, D. B., Peeling, P., Sharma, A. P., Ross, M. L. R., & Burke, L. M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • ACT Government (AU)
Corresponding author
McKay, Alannah K. A.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2018-09-12
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
553-559
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2890171963
Cited by
20
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Catholic University Research Fund
  • Australian Institute of Sport’s High Performance Sport Research Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
carbohydrate availability, mucosal immunity, salivary IgA, endurance athletes, race walking, high-carbohydrate diet, low-carbohydrate high-fat diet, high-volume training, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Diet, Carbohydrate Loading, Adult, Dietary Carbohydrates, Female, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Secretory, Male, Physical Endurance, Saliva, Walking, Immunity, Mucosal, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Young Adult, Diet, High-Fat, Physical Conditioning, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review