The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Kinematics and Kinetic Comparison of Overground and Treadmill Running
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the kinematic and kinetic parameters of treadmill running to those of overground running. METHODS: Twenty healthy young subjects ran overground at their self-selected moderate running speed. Motion capture and ground reaction force (GRF) data for three strides of each limb were recorded and the subjects' average running speed was evaluated. The subjects then ran on an instrumented treadmill set to their average overground running speed while motion capture and GRF data were recorded. The kinematics (body segment orientations and joint angles) and kinetics (net joint moments and joint powers) for treadmill (15 consecutive gait cycles) and overground running (three cycles each limb) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The features of the kinematic and kinetic trajectories of treadmill gait were similar to those of overground gait. Statistically significant differences in knee kinematics,the peak values of GRF, joint moment, and joint power trajectories were identified. DISCUSSION: Parameters measured with an adequate instrumented treadmill are comparable to but not directly equivalent to those measured for overground running. With such an instrument, it is possible to study the mechanics of running under well-controlled and reproducible conditions. SIGNIFICANCE: Treadmill-based analysis of running mechanics can be generalized to overground running mechanics, provided the treadmill surface is sufficiently stiff and belt speed is adequately regulated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking
Kadaba, M. P., Ramakrishnan, H. K., & Wootten, M. E. (1990) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100080310 · Cited by 3,216
Cited by
Increasing Running Step Rate Reduces Patellofemoral Joint Forces
LENHART, R. L., THELEN, D. G., WILLE, C. M., CHUMANOV, E. S., & HEIDERSCHEIT, B. C. (2014) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3182a78c3a · Cited by 257
Minimal energetic expenditure of women walking burdened on gradients in urban environments
Rue, M. J., & Kramer, P. A. (2017) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.22907 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- RILEY, P. O., DICHARRY, J., FRANZ, J., CROCE, U. D., WILDER, R. P., & KERRIGAN, D. C.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1093-1100
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093712854
- Cited by
- 463
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Kinematics and Kinetic Comparison of Overground and Treadmill Running. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181677530
- The paper
- RILEY, P. O., DICHARRY, J., FRANZ, J., CROCE, U. D., WILDER, R. P., & KERRIGAN, D. C. (2008). A Kinematics and Kinetic Comparison of Overground and Treadmill Running. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181677530
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
