Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 811

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fuzzy Cluster Analysis: A New Method to Predict Future Cardiac Events in Patients With Positive Stress Tests

Open access
Peters, Robert M., Shanies, Stanley A., Peters, John C.·1998·Japanese Circulation Journal

Abstract

Several studies have shown that combining the change in the ST-segment with another exercise variable improves the predictive value of stress testing. However, no method has been able to combine many stress test variables with the ST-segment change simultaneously and help the clinician better predict future cardiac events. Fuzzy Cluster Analysis (FCA) was used to combine 5 stress test variables with ST-segment deviation to classify each of 232 positive outpatient stress tests as mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal. Cardiac events were recorded in these 3 patient groups up to 96 months (mean 65 months) after the stress tests. Coronary angiography was performed on 159 of these patients within 1 month of their stress tests. FCA better separated the 3 event-free survival curves than classifying the stress tests by three ST-segment (0.5-1.5 mm, 2-2.5 mm, > 3 mm) groups (p < 0.05). At 2 years, 90% of the FCA mild group were compared with 70% for the 0.5-1.5 mm group (p < 0.01). Moderate and severe tests by FCA separated patients with an intermediate from those with a poor prognosis while the 2-2.5 mm and 3 mm or more ST-segment curves did not (p < 0.05). FCA showed overall better correlation with coronary score (r = 0.71) than did the graded ST-segment groups (r = 0.48). FCA predicted both mild and high-grade (triple-vessel and left main) coronary disease better than ST-segment alone. Thus FCA better predicts future cardiac events in patients with positive stress tests than the ST-segment alone. This combined with its usefulness in predicting the extent of coronary disease provides the basis of a clinical strategy for managing patients with positive stress tests.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1253/jcj.62.750

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 811

Metadata

Authors
Peters, R. M., Shanies, S. A., & Peters, J. C.
Venue
Japanese Circulation Journal
Published
1998
Volume
62
Issue
10
Pages
750-754
ISSN
  • 0047-1828 (ISSN-L)
  • 1347-4839
OpenAlex
W1941358455
Cited by
811
References
1
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuzzy Cluster Analysis: A New Method to Predict Future Cardiac Events in Patients With Positive Stress Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1253/jcj.62.750
The paper
Peters, R. M., Shanies, S. A., & Peters, J. C. (1998). Fuzzy Cluster Analysis: A New Method to Predict Future Cardiac Events in Patients With Positive Stress Tests. Japanese Circulation Journal. https://doi.org/10.1253/jcj.62.750

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.