Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,062

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?

Open access
Alesina, Alberto, Weder, Beatrice·2002·American Economic Review

Abstract

Critics of foreign aid programs argue that these funds often support corrupt governments and inefficient bureaucracies.Supporters argue that foreign aid can be used to reward good governments.This paper documents that there is no evidence that less corrupt governments receive more foreign aid.On the contrary, according to some measures of corruption, more corrupt governments receive more aid.Also, we could not find any evidence that an increase in foreign aid reduces corruption.In summary, the answer to the question posed in the title is "no."

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/00028280260344669

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,062

Metadata

Authors
Alesina, A., & Weder, B.
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2002-08-01
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
1126-1137
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125215326
Cited by
1,062
References
2
FWCI
71.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/00028280260344669
The paper
Alesina, A., & Weder, B. (2002). Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid? American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260344669

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.