The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax?
Open accessAbstract
This paper develops an analytical framework for assessing the second-best optimal level of gasoline taxation taking into account unpriced pollution, congestion, and accident externalities, and interactions with the broader fiscal system. We provide calculations of the optimal taxes for the US and the UK under a wide variety of parameter scenarios, with the gasoline tax substituting for a distorting tax on labor income. Under our central parameter values, the second-best optimal gasoline tax is $1.01/gal for the US and $1.34/gal for the UK. These values are moderately sensitive to alternative parameter assumptions. The congestion externality is the largest component in both nations, and the higher optimal tax for the UK is due mainly to a higher assumed value for marginal congestion cost. Revenue-raising needs, incorporated in a "Ramsey" component, also play a significant role, as do accident externalities and local air pollution. The current gasoline tax in the UK ($2.80/gal) is more than twice this estimated optimal level. Potential welfare gains from reducing it are estimated at nearly one-fourth the production cost of gasoline used in the UK. Even larger gains in the UK can be achieved by switching to a tax on vehicle miles with equal revenue yield. For the US, the welfare gains from optimizing the gasoline tax are smaller, but those from switching to an optimal tax on vehicle miles are very large.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Review of British Evidence on Time and Service Quality Valuations
Wardman, M. (2001) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/s1366-5545(00)00012-0 · Cited by 411
Cited by
Fuel taxes: An important instrument for climate policy
Sterner, T. (2007) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.025 · Cited by 458
Are We Reaching Peak Travel? Trends in Passenger Transport in Eight Industrialized Countries
Millard‐Ball, A., & Schipper, L. (2011) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2010.518291 · Cited by 339
Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore the Potential Impacts of Automated Vehicles
Childress, S., Nichols, B., Charlton, B., & Coe, S. (2015) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2493-11 · Cited by 319
Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax
Bristow, A. L., Wardman, M., Zanni, A. M., & Chintakayala, P. K. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.021 · Cited by 230
The Role of Government in the Market for Electric Vehicles: Evidence from China
Li, S., Zhu, X., Ma, Y., Zhang, F., & Zhou, H. (2022) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.22362 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Parry, I. W. H., & Small, K. A.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2005-08-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1276-1289
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999386912
- Cited by
- 753
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/0002828054825510
- The paper
- Parry, I. W. H., & Small, K. A. (2005). Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax? American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828054825510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.