The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population
Open accessAbstract
We analyze risk preferences using an experiment with real incentives in a representative sample of 1,422 Dutch respondents. Our econometric model incorporates four structural parameters that vary with observed and unobserved characteristics: utility curvature, loss aversion, preferences toward the timing of uncertainty resolution, and the propensity to choose randomly rather than on the basis of preferences. We find that all four parameters contribute to explaining choice behavior. The structural parameters are significantly associated with socioeconomic variables, but it is essential to incorporate unobserved heterogeneity in each of them to match the rich variety of choice patterns in the data. (JEL D12, D81)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These are in contrast to results of our human experiment (SI Appendix, Tables S5 and S6) and prior studies where rationality score and preference have been shown to differ across demographic groups (22, 28, 61).”
From The emergence of economic rationality of GPT (2023) · cites this paper as [61]
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
Kahneman, D. J., & Tversky, A. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014 · Cited by 32,720
Theory of games and economic behavior
Garcia, S. R., & Miller, S. J. (2019) · American Mathematical Society eBooks · doi:10.1090/mbk/121/32 · Cited by 16,777
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00122574 · Cited by 15,467
Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation
Train, K. E. (2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805271 · Cited by 7,784
Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects
Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282802762024700 · Cited by 5,893
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
Pratt, J. W. (1964) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913738 · Cited by 4,976
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large
Pratt, J. W. (1976) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912743 · Cited by 4,702
Allais, M. (1953) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1907921 · Cited by 4,054
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ahlbrecht Martin, 1996, Journal of institutional and Theoretical Economics, 152, 593
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 353
Risk Information and Retirement Investment Choice Mistakes Under Prospect Theory
Bateman, H., Stevens, R., & Lai, A. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Finance · doi:10.1080/15427560.2015.1095749 · Cited by 34
López-Guzmán, S., Konova, A. B., & Glimcher, P. W. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2018.0135 · Cited by 31
Money or meaning? Labor supply responses to work meaning of employed and unemployed individuals
Kesternich, I., Schumacher, H., Siflinger, B. M., & Schwarz, Š. (2021) · European Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103786 · Cited by 28
Attentional shifts and preference reversals: An eye-tracking study
Alós‐Ferrer, C., Jaudas, A., & Ritschel, A. (2021) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500008305 · Cited by 24
Measuring preferences over the temporal resolution of consumption uncertainty
Meißner, T., & Pfeiffer, P. (2021) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/j.jet.2021.105379 · Cited by 26
Mesurer les préférences des épargnants : comment et pourquoi (en temps de crise) ?
Arrondel, L., & Masson, A. (2014) · Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics · doi:10.3406/estat.2014.10244 · Cited by 27
Off the Charts: Massive Unexplained Heterogeneity in a Global Study of Ambiguity Attitudes
L’Haridon, O., Vieider, F. M., Aycinena, D., Bandur, A., Belianin, A. V., Cingl, L., Kothiyal, A., & Martinsson, P. (2018) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00724 · Cited by 27
Quantifying Loss Aversion: Evidence from a UK Population Survey
Blake, D. P., Cannon, E. S., & Wright, D. (2019) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-021-09356-7 · Cited by 33
Relative concave utility for risk and ambiguity
Baillon, A., Driesen, B., & Wakker, P. P. (2012) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2012.01.006 · Cited by 27
Terzi, A., Koedijk, K. C. G., NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Pownall, R. A. J. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01347 · Cited by 27
Temporal discounting of gains and losses of time: An experimental investigation
Abdellaoui, M., Gutierrez, C., & Kemel, E. (2018) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-018-9287-1 · Cited by 26
Return expectations and risk aversion heterogeneity in household portfolios
Bucciol, A., Miniaci, R., & Pastorello, S. (2016) · Journal of Empirical Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2016.08.002 · Cited by 26
Measuring risk aversion to guide transportation policy: Contexts, incentives, and respondents
Dixit, V. V., Harb, R. C., Martínez‐Correa, J., & Rutström, E. E. (2015) · Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2015.07.002 · Cited by 27
DISCRETE CHOICE ESTIMATION OF RISK AVERSIONPreprint
Apesteguía, J., & Ballester, M. Á. G. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 26
Chapman, J., Dean, M. R. W., Ortoleva, P., Snowberg, E., & Camerer, C. F. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24931 · Cited by 29
Cognitive ability, financial literacy, and narrow bracketing in time-preference elicitation
Oberrauch, L., & Kaiser, T. (2022) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2022.101844 · Cited by 25
The determinants affecting the intention of urban residents to prepare for flood risk in China
Wang, T., Lu, Y., Liu, T., Zhang, Y., Yan, X., & Liu, Y. (2022) · Natural hazards and earth system sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-22-2185-2022 · Cited by 25
Intrinsic Information Preferences and Skewness
Masatlıoĝlu, Y., Orhun, A. Y., & Raymond, C. (2023) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20171474 · Cited by 53
We are all Behavioral, More or Less: A Taxonomy of Consumer Decision MakingPreprint
Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2020) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.3386/w28138 · Cited by 18
Risk aversion and job mobility
van Huizen, T., & Alessie, R. J. M. (2019) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.01.021 · Cited by 24
Fanghella, V., Faure, C., Guetlein, M.-C., & Schleich, J. E. (2022) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107659 · Cited by 23
Risk attitudes, development, and growth: Macroeconomic evidence from experiments in 30 countriesPreprint
Vieider, F. M., Chmura, T., & Martinsson, P. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 24
Status quo bias and attitude towards risk: An experimental investigation
Bekir, I., & Doss, F. (2020) · Managerial and Decision Economics · doi:10.1002/mde.3140 · Cited by 21
Consumer inequality aversion and risk preferences in community supported agriculture
Bernard, K., Bonein, A., & Bougherara, D. (2020) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106684 · Cited by 22
Hopland, A. O., Matsen, E., & Strøm, B. (2016) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2016.09.001 · Cited by 22
True to type? EU-style date marking and the valuation of perishable food
D’Amato, A., Goeschl, T., Lorè, L., & Zoli, M. (2022) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2022.102381 · Cited by 22
Innovation in Online Data Collection for Scientific Research: The Dutch MESS Project
Das, M. (2012) · Methodological Innovations Online · doi:10.4256/mio.2012.002 · Cited by 21
ASSIMILATION IN THE RISK PREFERENCES OF SPOUSES
Falco, S. D., & Vieider, F. M. (2017) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/ecin.12531 · Cited by 21
Getting policy-makers to listen to field experiments
Dolan, P., & Galizzi, M. M. (2014) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/gru035 · Cited by 22
Meta-Analysis of Empirical Estimates of Loss-AversionPreprint
Brown, A. L., Imai, T., Vieider, F. M., & Camerer, C. (2020) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.31222/osf.io/hnefr · Cited by 161
Risk preferences and personality traits in children and adolescents
Piovesan, M., & Willadsen, H. (2021) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.04.011 · Cited by 20
Why do individuals not participate in the stock market?
Veld‐Merkoulova, Y. V., & Veld, C. (2022) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102292 · Cited by 20
Nonlinear Decision Weights or Skewness Preference? A Model Competition
Spiliopoulos, L., & Hertwig, R. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.023 · Cited by 22
Behavioral Biases are Temporally Stable
Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27860 · Cited by 20
Testing the ‘standard’ model of stochastic choice under risk
Butler, D., Isoni, A., & Loomes, G. (2012) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-012-9154-4 · Cited by 17
It’s all about gains: Risk preferences in problem gambling.
Ring, P., Probst, C. C., Neyse, L., Wolff, S., Kaernbach, C., van Eimeren, T., Camerer, C. F., & Schmidt, U. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000418 · Cited by 20
The Standard Portfolio Choice Problem in Germany
Breunig, C., Huck, S., Schmidt, T., & Weizsäcker, G. (2021) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/ueab006 · Cited by 19
Loss Aversion and Housing Studies
Bao, H. X. H., & Meng, C. C. (2017) · Journal of Real Estate Literature · doi:10.1080/10835547.2017.12090454 · Cited by 18
Chapman, J., Snowberg, E., Wang, S., & Camerer, C. F. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4978692 · Cited by 16
Less is more: Increasing retirement gains by using an upside terminal wealth constraint
Donnelly, C., Gerrard, R., Guillén, M., & Nielsen, J. P. (2015) · Insurance Mathematics and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.06.003 · Cited by 16
Defaults, normative anchors, and the occurrence of risky and cautious shifts
Jagau, S., & Offerman, T. (2018) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-018-9282-6 · Cited by 16
The Quest for Parsimony in Behavioral Economics: New Methods and Evidence on Three Fronts
Stango, V., Yoong, J., & Zinman, J. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23057 · Cited by 20
Risk preferences, gender effects and Bayesian econometrics
Alam, J., Georgalos, K., & Rolls, H. (2022) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2022.08.013 · Cited by 15
Tymula, A. A., Wang, X., Imaizumi, Y., Kawai, T., Kunimatsu, J., Matsumoto, M., & Yamada, H. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.ade7972 · Cited by 20
On the robustness of gender differences in economic behavior
Fornwagner, H., Brit Grosskopf, A., Lauf, A., Schöller, V., & Städter, S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25141-1 · Cited by 15
Incentive Magnitude Effects in Experimental Games: Bigger is not Necessarily Better
Pulford, B. D., Colman, A. M., & Loomes, G. (2018) · Games · doi:10.3390/g9010004 · Cited by 15
Glimcher, P. W., & Tymula, A. A. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181112 · Cited by 15
Loss Aversion and Market CrashesPreprint
Ouzan, S. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2020.06.015 · Cited by 18
Temporal Risk: Utility vs. Probability Weighting
Abdellaoui, M., Diecidue, E., Kemel, E., & Öncüler, A. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4124 · Cited by 14
Gender differences in risk attitudes
Filippin, A. (2016) · IZA World of Labor · doi:10.15185/izawol.100 · Cited by 13
Braams, B. R., Davidow, J. Y., & Somerville, L. H. (2021) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101039 · Cited by 14
The Rose‐Tinted Spectacles of Homeowners
van der Cruijsen, C. A. B., Jansen, D., & van Rooij, M. (2016) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12134 · Cited by 33
Entrepreneurs under Uncertainty: An Economic ExperimentPreprint
Holm, H. J., Opper, S., & Nee, V. G. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 13
Is Roger Federer more loss averse than Serena Williams?
Anbarcı, N., Arin, K. P., Ökten, Ç., & Zenker, C. (2016) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2016.1262527 · Cited by 11
What Makes Investors Optimistic, What Makes them Afraid?Preprint
Hoffmann, A. O. I., & Post, T. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2184220 · Cited by 12
Gender, pensions and income in retirement
ESRI, Nolan, A., Whelan, A., ESRI, McGuinness, S., ESRI, Maître, B., & ESRI (2019) · doi:10.26504/rs87 · Cited by 14
Loss aversion is not robust: A re-meta-analysis
Yechiam, E., & Zeif, D. (2025) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2025.102801 · Cited by 16
Assortative matching and social interaction: A field experiment on adolescents’ risky choices
Lucks, K. E., Lührmann, M., & Winter, J. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.011 · Cited by 11
Hunger enhances consistent economic choices in non-human primates
Yamada, H. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02417-5 · Cited by 11
Recovering Preferences From Finite Data
Chambers, C. P., Echenique, F., & Lambert, N. S. (2021) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta17845 · Cited by 11
Risk Aversion, Prudence and Temperance: It Is a Matter of Gap Between Moments
Colasante, A., & Riccetti, L. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2019.100262 · Cited by 13
Gender differences in risk attitudes
Filippin, A. (2022) · IZA World of Labor · doi:10.15185/izawol.100.v2 · Cited by 11
Consumer loss aversion and scale-dependent psychological switching costs
Karle, H., Schumacher, H., & Vølund, R. (2023) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2023.01.001 · Cited by 12
Individual Preference for Longshots
Chark, R., Chew, S. H., & Zhong, S. (2019) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvz004 · Cited by 11
All Over the Map: Heterogeneity of Risk Preferences across Individuals, Prospects, and CountriesPreprint
L’Haridon, O., & Vieider, F. M. (2016) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 11
Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2019) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w25540 · Cited by 11
Looming Large or Seeming Small? Attitudes Towards Losses in a Representative Sample
Chapman, J., Snowberg, E., Wang, S. W., & Camerer, C. (2025) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdae093 · Cited by 10
Crowded out: Heterogeneity in risk attitudes among poor households in the US
Galliera, A., & Rutström, E. E. (2021) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-021-09363-8 · Cited by 10
Consumer perception of deposit insurance: little awareness, limited effectiveness?
Bijlsma, M. J., & van der Wiel, K. (2015) · Applied Economics · doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1016208 · Cited by 10
Tymula, A. A., Glimcher, P. W., Levy, I., & Belmaker, L. R. (2012) · Cited by 10
Evans, B. J., & Boatman, A. (2019) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2019.1574542 · Cited by 15
Financial and non-financial risk attitudes: What does it matter?
Colasante, A., & Riccetti, L. (2021) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100494 · Cited by 11
Balancing against geopolitical risk: Household investment portfolios during the U.S.-China trade war
Cai, X., Cheng, Z., & Li, D. (2024) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2024.105703 · Cited by 9
Precaution with multiple instruments: The importance of substitution effects
Heinzel, C., & Peter, R. (2023) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2023.01.004 · Cited by 9
Determinants of financial loss aversion: The influence of prenatal androgen exposure (2D:4D)
Hermann, D. (2017) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.016 · Cited by 9
Consistency in simple vs. complex choices by younger and older adults
Brocas, I., Carrillo, J. D., Combs, T. D., & Kodaverdian, N. (2018) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2018.10.019 · Cited by 15
The Standard Portfolio Choice Problem in GermanyPreprint
Huck, S., Schmidt, T., & Weizsäcker, G. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2432045 · Cited by 9
Castillo, M. E. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3620635 · Cited by 10
Quicksand or Bedrock for Behavioral Economics? Assessing Foundational Empirical Questions
Stango, V., Yoong, J., & Zinman, J. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w23625 · Cited by 9
The Impact of Violence on Individual Risk Preferences: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Jakiela, P., & Ozier, O. W. (2015) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-7440 · Cited by 10
Incentive design for reference-dependent preferences
Jimenez, V. G. (2024) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.03.005 · Cited by 9
Financial literacy in the DNB Household Survey: insights from innovative data collection
van Rooij, M., Alessie, R. J. M., & Lusardi, A. (2024) · Journal of Financial Literacy and Wellbeing · doi:10.1017/flw.2024.9 · Cited by 8
Exploring the Interplay of Risk Attitude and Organic Food Consumption
Giampietri, E., Bugin, G., & Trestini, S. (2020) · International Journal on Food System Dynamics · doi:10.18461/ijfsd.v11i3.49 · Cited by 8
Are religious farmers more risk taking? Empirical evidence from Ethiopia
Kahsay, G. A., Kassie, W. A., Medhin, H., & Hansen, L. G. (2022) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12697 · Cited by 8
The predictive power of risk elicitation tasks
Garagnani, M. (2023) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/s11166-023-09408-0 · Cited by 8
Andrikogiannopoulou, A., & Papakonstantinou, F. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2239194 · Cited by 7
Strength of Preference and Decision Making Under RiskPreprint
Alós‐Ferrer, C., & Garagnani, M. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3428515 · Cited by 7
Risk Aversion Relates to Cognitive Ability: Fact or Fiction?Preprint
Andersson, O., Holm, H. J., Tyran, J., & Wengström, E. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2347367 · Cited by 7
Self-citationThe Quest for Parsimony in Behavioral Economics: New Methods and Evidence on Three FrontsPreprint
Stango, V., Yoong, J., & Zinman, J. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2910574 · Cited by 7
Risk in Time: The Intertwined Nature of Risk Taking and Time Discounting
Epper, T., & Fehr-Duda, H. (2023) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvad041 · Cited by 83
Framing Effects on Risk-Taking Behavior: Evidence from a Field Experiment
Balart, P., Ezquerra, L., & Hernandez-Arenaz, I. (2020) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-022-09748-9 · Cited by 14
Credit Cards: Transactional Convenience or Debt‐Trap?
Brown, S. J., Veld, C., & Veld‐Merkoulova, Y. V. (2018) · International Review of Finance · doi:10.1111/irfi.12228 · Cited by 6
Giamouzi, M., & Nomikos, N. K. (2020) · Transportation Research Part E Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102129 · Cited by 7
Measuring risk‐taking and patience in financial decision making
Breuer, W., Renerken, T., & Salzmann, A. J. (2021) · Review of Financial Economics · doi:10.1002/rfe.1142 · Cited by 11
The availability of non-instrumental information increases risky decision-making
Matthews, J., Cooper, P. S., Bode, S., & Chong, T. T. ‐. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02279-1 · Cited by 8
Measuring risk preferences in rural Ethiopia: Risk tolerance and exogenous income proxies
Vieider, F. M., Beyene, A., Bluffstone, R., Dissanayake, S., Gebreegziabher, Z., Martinsson, P., & Mekonnen, A. (2014) · doi:10.1596/1813-9450-7137 · Cited by 13
Is Attention Produced Optimally? Theory and Evidence from Experiments with Bandwidth Enhancements
Bronchetti, E. T., Kessler, J. B., Magenheim, E., Taubinsky, D., & Zwick, E. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27443 · Cited by 6
Uncertainty Attitudes, Subjective Expectations and Decisions under UncertaintyPreprint
Delavande, A., Ganguli, J. V., & Mengel, F. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4060001 · Cited by 8
What You Eat is What You Are:Risk Attitudes, Time Preferences, and Diet QualityPreprint
Nebout, A., Berlin, N., Vieux, F., Péneau, S., Darmon, N., Kemel, E., & Paroissien, E. (2023) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4474126 · Cited by 4
Measuring natural source dependence
Gutierrez, C., & Kemel, E. (2024) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1007/s10683-024-09822-4 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- von Gaudecker, H.-M., van Soest, A., & Wengström, E.
- Affiliations
- Department of Economics, Universität Mannheim, L7 3-5, 68131 Mannheim, Germany.
- Netspar, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands.
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- ORCID
- Wengström, Erik
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2011-04-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 664-694
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-7981
- OpenAlex
- W1505758174
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 13.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Keywords
- decision making under risk, risk preferences, preference heterogeneity, loss aversion, utility curvature, random choice, unobserved heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
