Cited by 165Corruption and Economic DevelopmentCrime, Illicit Activities, and GovernanceSocial Capital and Networks

The Impact of Crime and Insecurity on Trust in Democracy and Institutions

Blanco, Luisa, Ruiz, Isabel·2013·American Economic Review

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of crime and insecurity on support for and satisfaction with democracy and trust in institutions. We use survey data from the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP) for Colombia during the 2004-2010 period. We find that perceptions of insecurity, crime victimization, being asked for a bribe and being affected by the armed conflict have a negative significant effect on satisfaction with democracy and trust in public institutions. Our findings show an important indirect channel through which crime can hinder development because distrust in institutions is associated with lower levels of social capital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.103.3.284

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect of conflict on subsequent institutional and political reforms toward more democracy and liberalization is weak and seemingly quite short-lived.

    “At the same time, the effect of conflict on subsequent institutional and political reforms toward more democracy and liberalization is weak and seemingly quite shortlived (150-153).”

    From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [150]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blanco, L., & Ruiz, I.
Affiliations
  • Pepperdine University (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2013-05-01
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
284-288
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066081072
Cited by
165
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
16.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • Pepperdine Digital Commons (Pepperdine University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
Keywords
crime, insecurity, institutional trust, satisfaction with democracy, crime victimization, bribery, armed conflict, social capital, public opinion, Colombia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review