Cited by 988Global trade and economicsMarket Dynamics and VolatilityMonetary Policy and Economic Impact

Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States

Open access
Handley, Kyle, Limão, Nuno·2017·American Economic Review

Abstract

We examine the impact of policy uncertainty on trade, prices, and real income through firm entry investments in general equilibrium. We estimate and quantify the impact of trade policy on China's export boom to the United States following its 2001 WTO accession. We find the accession reduced the US threat of a trade war, which can account for over one-third of that export growth in the period 2000– 2005. Reduced policy uncertainty lowered US prices and increased its consumers' income by the equivalent of a 13-percentage-point permanent tariff decrease. These findings provide evidence of large effects of policy uncertainty on economic activity and the importance of agreements for reducing it. (JEL D72, F13, F14, O19, P33)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.20141419

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trade liberalization reduced trade-policy uncertainty due to binding commitments in GATT/WTO and regional trade agreements.

    “it also reduced trade -policy uncertainty due to the binding commitments that countries made when entering the GATT/WTO or signing regional trade agreements.”

    From De-Globalisation? Global Value Chains in the Post-COVID-19 Age (2020) · cites this paper as Handley and Limao, 2017

    The opening discussion and Conclusion report that China’s WTO accession reduced trade-policy uncertainty, while “D. Outcomes and Policy Experiments” describes WTO tariff bindings as commitments. The paper also discusses how agreements can make trade policy more predictable, but the passages do not establish the claimed reduction for regional trade agreements specifically. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 43

  1. Amador, Manuel, and Kyle Bagwell. 2013. 'The Theory of Optimal Delegation with an Application to Tariff Caps.' Econometrica 81 ( 4 ) : 1541-99.
  2. Amiti, Mary, and Caroline Freund. 2010. 'The Anatomy of China's Export Growth.' In China's Growing Role in World Trade , edited by Robert C. Feenstra and Shang-Jin Wei, 35-56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Arkolakis, Costas, Arnaud Costinot, and Andrés Rodríguez-Clare. 2012. 'New Trade Models, Same Old Gains?' American Economic Review 102 ( 1 ) : 94-130.
  4. Auer, Raphael, and Andreas M. Fischer. 2010. 'The Effect of Low-Wage Import Competition on U.S. Inflationary Pressure.' Journal of Monetary Economics 57 ( 4 ) : 491-503.
  5. Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson. 2013. 'The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States.' American Economic Review 103 ( 6 ) : 2121-68.
  6. Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert W. Staiger. 1999. 'An Economic Theory of GATT.' American Economic Review 89 ( 1 ) : 215-48.
  7. Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert W. Staiger. 2011. 'What Do Trade Negotiators Negotiate About? Empirical Evidence from the World Trade Organization.' American Economic Review 101 ( 4 ) : 1238-73.
  8. Baker, Scott R., Nicholas Bloom, and Steven J. Davis. 2016. 'Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 ( 4 ) : 1593-636.
  9. Bernanke, Ben S. 1983. 'Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Cyclical Investment.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 98 ( 1 ) : 85-106.
  10. Blonigen, Bruce A., and Alyson C. Ma. 2010. 'Please Pass the Catch-Up: The Relative Performance of Foreign Firms in Chinese Exports.' In China's Growing Role in World Trade , edited by Robert C. Feenstra and Shang-Jin Wei, 475-509. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  11. Bloom, Nicholas, Stephen Bond, and John van Reenen. 2007. 'Uncertainty and Investment Dynamics.' Review of Economic Studies 74 ( 2 ) : 391-415.
  12. Bloom, Nicholas, Mirko Draca, and John van Reenen. 2016. 'Trade Induced Technical Change? The Impact of Chinese Imports on Innovation, IT and Productivity.' Review of Economic Studies 83 ( 1 ) : 87-117.
  13. Brambilla, Irene, Amit K. Khandelwal, and Peter K. Schott. 2010. 'China's Experience under the Multi-Fiber Arrangement ( MFA ) and the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing ( ATC ) . In China's Growing Role in World Trade , edited by Robert C. Feenstra and Shang-Jin Wei, 345-87. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Brandt, Loren, Johannes Van Biesebroeck, and Yifan Zhang. 2012. 'Creative Accounting or Creative Destruction? Firm-Level Productivity Growth in Chinese Manufacturing.' Journal of Development Economics 97 ( 2 ) : 339-51.
  15. Broda, Christian, Nuno Limão, and David E. Weinstein. 2008. 'Optimal Tariffs and Market Power: The Evidence.' American Economic Review 98 ( 5 ) : 2032-65.
  16. Broda, Christian, and David E. Weinstein. 2006. 'Globalization and the Gains from Variety.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 121 ( 2 ) : 541-85.
  17. Chaney, Thomas. 2008. 'Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade.' American Economic Review 98 ( 4 ) : 1707-21.
  18. Costinot, Arnaud, and Andrés Rodríguez-Clare. 2014. 'Trade Theory with Numbers: Quantifying the Consequences of Globalization.' In Handbook of International Economics , Volume 4, edited by Gita Gopinath, Elhanan Helpman, and Kenneth Rogoff, 197-261. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  19. Dixit, Avinash K. 1989. 'Entry and Exit Decisions under Uncertainty.' Journal of Political Economy 97 ( 3 ) : 620-38.
  20. Eaton, Jonathan, Samuel Kortum, and Francis Kramarz. 2011. 'An Anatomy of International Trade: Evidence from French Firms.' Econometrica 79 ( 5 ) : 1453-98.
  21. Feenstra, Robert C. 1994. 'New Product Varieties and the Measurement of International Prices.' American Economic Review 84 ( 1 ) : 157-77.
  22. Handley, Kyle. 2014. 'Exporting under Trade Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Evidence.' Journal of International Economics 94 ( 1 ) : 50-66.
  23. Handley, Kyle, and Nuno Limão. 2015. 'Trade and Investment under Policy Uncertainty: Theory and Firm Evidence.' American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 7 ( 4 ) : 189-222.
  24. Handley, Kyle, and Nuno Limão. 2017. 'Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States: Dataset.' American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/ aer.20141419. http://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141419
  25. Horn, Henrik, Giovanni Maggi, and Robert W. Staiger. 2010. 'Trade Agreements as Endogenously Incomplete Contracts.' American Economic Review 100 ( 1 ) : 394 - 419.
  26. Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Peter J. Klenow. 2009. 'Misallocation and Manufacturing TFP in China and India.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 ( 4 ) : 1403-48.
  27. Hsieh, Chang-Tai, and Ralph Ossa. 2016. 'A Global View of Productivity Growth in China.' Journal of International Economics 102 ( 1 ) : 209-24.
  28. Impullitti, Giammario, Alfonso A. Irarrazabal, and Luca David Opromolla. 2013. 'A Theory of Entry into and Exit from Export Markets.' Journal of International Economics 90 ( 1 ) : 75-90.
  29. Kee, Hiau Looi, and Heiwai Tang. 2016. 'Domestic Value Added in Exports: Theory and Firm Evidence from China.' American Economic Review 106 ( 6 ) : 1402-36.
  30. Lileeva, Alla, and Daniel Trefler. 2010. 'Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-Level Productivity… For Some Plants.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 ( 3 ) : 1051-99.
  31. Limão, Nuno, and Giovanni Maggi. 2015. 'Uncertainty and Trade Agreements.' American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 7 ( 4 ) : 1-42.
  32. Ludema, Rodney D., and Anna Maria Mayda. 2013. 'Do Terms-of-Trade Effects Matter for Trade Agreements? Theory and Evidence from WTO Countries.' Quarterly Journal of Economics 128 ( 4 ) : 1837-93.
  33. Ma, Yue, Heiwai Tang, and Yifan Zhang. 2014. 'Factor Intensity, Product Switching, and Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Exporters.' Journal of International Economics 92 ( 2 ) : 349-62.
  34. Ossa, Ralph. 2014. 'Trade Wars and Trade Talks with Data.' American Economic Review 104 ( 12 ) : 4104-46.
  35. Pierce, Justin R., and Peter K. Schott. 2012. 'A Concordance between Ten-Digit U.S. Harmonized System Codes and SIC / NAICS Product Classes and Industries.' Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 37 ( 1-2 ) : 61-96.
  36. Pierce, Justin R., and Peter K. Schott. 2016. 'The Surprisingly Swift Decline of US Manufacturing Employment.' American Economic Review 106 ( 7 ) : 1632-62.
  37. Roberts, Mark J., and James R. Tybout. 1997. 'The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs.' American Economic Review 87 ( 4 ) : 545-64.
  38. Robinson, Peter M. 1988. 'Root-N-Consistent Semiparametric Regression.' Econometrica 56 ( 4 ) : 931-54.
  39. Rodrik, Dani. 1991. 'Policy Uncertainty and Private Investment in Developing Countries.' Journal of Development Economics 36 ( 2 ) : 229-42.
  40. Romalis, John. 2007. 'NAFTA's and CUSFTA's Impact on International Trade.' Review of Economics and Statistics 89 ( 3 ) : 416-35.
  41. Rose, Andrew K. 2004. 'Do We Really Know That the WTO Increases Trade?' American Economic Review 94 ( 1 ) : 98-114.
  42. Subramanian, Arvind, and Shang-Jin Wei. 2007. 'The WTO Promotes Trade, Strongly But Unevenly.' Journal of International Economics 72 ( 1 ) : 151-75.
  43. Zeng, Ka. 2003. Trade Threats, Trade Wars: Bargaining, Retaliation, and American Coercive Diplomacy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Handley, K., & Limão, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2017-09-01
Volume
107
Issue
9
Pages
2731-2783
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2752061982
Cited by
988
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 216 · 2025: 184 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
89.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Keywords
policy uncertainty, trade policy, WTO accession, US-China trade relations, export boom, firm entry, general equilibrium, consumer welfare, price, tariffs, trade agreements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review