The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
This Mine is Mine! How Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa
Open accessAbstract
We combine georeferenced data on mining extraction of 14 minerals with information on conflict events at spatial resolution of 0.5 o × 0.5 o for all of Africa between 1997 and 2010. Exploiting exogenous variations in world prices, we find a positive impact of mining on conflict at the local level. Quantitatively, our estimates suggest that the historical rise in mineral prices (commodity super-cycle) might explain up to one-fourth of the average level of violence across African countries over the period. We then document how a fighting group's control of a mining area contributes to escalation from local to global violence. Finally, we analyze the impact of corporate practices and transparency initiatives in the mining industry. (JEL C23, D74, L70, O13, Q34)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
FEARON, J. D., & LAITIN, D. D. (2003) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055403000534 · Cited by 7,366
The political ecology of war: natural resources and armed conflicts
Le Billon, P. (2001) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/s0962-6298(01)00015-4 · Cited by 1,508
Commodity Price Shocks and Civil Conflict: Evidence from Colombia
Dube, O., & Vargas, J. F. (2013) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdt009 · Cited by 1,187
A Diamond Curse?: Civil War and a Lootable Resource
Lujala, P., Gleditsch, N. P., & Gilmore, E. (2005) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002705277548 · Cited by 476
The long-run effects of the scramble for Africa
Michalopoulos, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20131311 · Cited by 424
The Legacy of Historical Conflict: Evidence from Africa
BESLEY, T., & REYNAL-QUEROL, M. (2014) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055414000161 · Cited by 322
Cited by
Quasi-Experimental Shift-Share Research Designs
Borusyak, K., Hull, P., & Jaravel, X. (2022) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdab030 · Cited by 1,427
Difference-in-Differences Estimators of Intertemporal Treatment Effects
de Chaisemartin, C., & D’Haultfœuille, X. (2026) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_01414 · Cited by 740
Transhumant Pastoralism, Climate Change, and Conflict in Africa
McGuirk, E. F., & Nunn, N. (2025) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdae027 · Cited by 85
Terrorist attacks, land resource competition and violent farmer-herder conflicts
George, J., Adelaja, A., Awokuse, T., & Vaughan, O. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105241 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Berman, N., Couttenier, M., Rohner, D., & Thoenig, M.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2017-06-01
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1564-1610
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022133908
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 115.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: This Mine is Mine! How Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.20150774
- The paper
- Berman, N., Couttenier, M., Rohner, D., & Thoenig, M. (2017). This Mine is Mine! How Minerals Fuel Conflicts in Africa. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
