Cited by 158Global trade and economicsGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessEconomic Growth and Productivity

Nonparametric Counterfactual Predictions in Neoclassical Models of International Trade

Adao, Rodrigo, Costinot, Arnaud, Donaldson, Dave·2017·American Economic Review

Abstract

We develop a methodology to construct nonparametric counterfactual predictions, free of functional form restrictions on preferences and technology, in neoclassical models of international trade. First, we establish the equivalence between such models and reduced exchange models in which countries directly exchange factor services. This equivalence implies that, for an arbitrary change in trade costs, counterfactual changes in the factor content of trade, factor prices, and welfare only depend on the shape of a reduced factor demand system. Second, we provide sufficient conditions under which estimates of this system can be recovered nonparametrically. Together, these results offer a strict generalization of the parametric approach used in so-called gravity models. Finally, we use China's recent integration into the world economy to illustrate the feasibility and potential benefits of our approach. (JEL C51, D51, F11, F14, O19, P33)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.20150956

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fact that χ_j,k is invertible derives from the fact that demand for goods within a sector satisfies the connected substitutes property and standard Inada conditions hold, as in Adao et al. (2017).

    “The fact that χ j,k is invertible derives from the fact that demand for goods within a sector satisfies the connected substitutes property and standard Inada conditions hold, as in Adao et al. (2017).”

    From The Textbook Case for Industrial Policy: Theory Meets Data (2019) · cites this paper as Adao et al. (2017)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adao, R., Costinot, A., & Donaldson, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Economics, Princeton University, Fisher Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 (e-mail: )
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Venue
American Economic Review
Published
2017-03-01
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
633-689
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1491090927
Cited by
158
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
35.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
counterfactual prediction, neoclassical trade model, trade costs, factor content of trade, factor prices, welfare effects, nonparametric estimation, gravity model, China's integration into the world economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review