The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Familiarity Does Not Breed Contempt: Generosity, Discrimination, and Diversity in Delhi Schools
Open accessAbstract
I exploit a natural experiment in Indian schools to study how being integrated with poor students affects the social behaviors and academic outcomes of rich students. Using administrative data, lab and field experiments to measure outcomes, I find that having poor classmates makes rich students (i) more prosocial, generous, and egalitarian; and (ii) less likely to discriminate against poor students, and more willing to socialize with them. These effects are driven by personal interactions between rich and poor students. In contrast, I find mixed but overall modest impacts on rich students’ academic achievement. (JEL C90, D31, I21, I24, O15, Z13)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1954) · Cited by 15,935
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 9,708
Review of research in education
Shulman, L. S., Mowry, S., & Berliner, D. C. (1973) · F.E. Peacock eBooks · Cited by 7,754
(2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.7.i · Cited by 6,810
Threshold models of collective behavior
Granovetter, M. (1978) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226707 · Cited by 6,072
Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions
Easterly, W., & Levine, R. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355300555466 · Cited by 5,649
Dynamic models of segregation†
Schelling, T. C. (1971) · The Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/0022250x.1971.9989794 · Cited by 4,915
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828042002561 · Cited by 4,504
Bootstrap-Based Improvements for Inference With Clustered Errors
Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., & Miller, D. L. (2008) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.90.3.414 · Cited by 4,417
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Cited by
The Aggregate Effect of School Choice: Evidence from a Two-Stage Experiment in India *
Muralidharan, K., & Sundararaman, V. (2015) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv013 · Cited by 320
Types of Contact: A Field Experiment on Collaborative and Adversarial Caste Integration
Lowe, M. (2021) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20191780 · Cited by 282
Reshaping Adolescents' Gender Attitudes: Evidence from a School-Based Experiment in India
Dhar, D., Jain, T., & Jayachandran, S. (2018) · doi:10.3386/w25331 · Cited by 134
How Costly are Cultural Biases? Evidence from FinTech
D'Acunto, F., Ghosh, P., & Rossi, A. G. (2022) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4147353 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Rao, G.
- Venue
- American Economic Review
- Publisher
- American Economic Association
- Published
- 2019-03-01
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 774-809
- ISSN
- 0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W635976063
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 62.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Familiarity Does Not Breed Contempt: Generosity, Discrimination, and Diversity in Delhi Schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1257/aer.20180044
- The paper
- Rao, G. (2019). Familiarity Does Not Breed Contempt: Generosity, Discrimination, and Diversity in Delhi Schools. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180044
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.